Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.

Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon1, Joel S Karp, Michael E Casey

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. daubew@bellatlantic.net

Journal of Nuclear Medicine : Official Publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
|October 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional segregation in Parkinson's disease.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Brain-gut axis imaging, motion correction with [ <sup>11</sup> C]-carfentanil total-body PET.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

A multi-modal flow phantom for quantitative PET/Spectral CT.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Age-related changes to brain energetics revealed by PET/MRI imaging.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2026
Same author

Realization of Long Axial Field-of-View PET Technology in the Clinic and Research Environment.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same author

Increased PET <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28 binding in multiple sclerosis normal-appearing white matter correlates with MRI measures of myelin loss.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2026

The updated NU 2-2001 standard for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) performance measurements offers more clinically relevant and simpler tests. These revised PET scanner evaluations better reflect real-world imaging conditions and are less time-consuming.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Nuclear Medicine Technology

Background:

  • The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-1994 standard provided foundational guidelines for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) system performance measurements.
  • Advancements in PET scanner technology and clinical applications necessitated an update to ensure performance evaluations remained relevant and comprehensive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the revisions introduced in the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard for PET performance measurements.
  • To compare the NU 2-2001 standard with the previous NU 2-1994 standard, highlighting differences in methodology and their impact on performance characteristics.
  • To assess the improved clinical relevance and efficiency of the updated NU 2-2001 standard.

Main Methods:

  • Spatial resolution is now measured using a point source in three directions, replacing the line source method from NU 2-1994.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurements for scatter fraction, sensitivity, and counting rate performance utilize a 70-cm line source, accommodating the full axial field of view of modern PET scanners.
  • A new image quality measurement, representative of clinical conditions, replaces individual uniformity and correction accuracy assessments.

    • Main Results:

    • The NU 2-2001 standard accommodates testing of dedicated PET systems in 2D/3D modes and coincidence gamma cameras.
    • Revised measurements, particularly the use of a longer line source, better incorporate activity outside the scanner and cover the entire axial field of view.
    • The updated standard introduces a comprehensive image quality assessment, aiming for greater clinical realism.

    Conclusions:

    • The NU 2-2001 standard enhances the clinical relevance of PET performance evaluations, particularly for whole-body imaging.
    • The revised testing procedures are generally simpler and require less time compared to the NU 2-1994 standard.
    • The updated standard better reflects the capabilities of contemporary PET systems and their use in clinical practice.