Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Society, law and epilepsy].

F Villanueva-Gómez1, M C Fernández-Miranda

  • 1Servicio de Neurofisiología Clínica. Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, España. fvillanueva@hcas.insalud.es

Revista De Neurologia
|October 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Epilepsy is often misunderstood, leading to legal and social challenges. Reclassifying epilepsy as a neurological disorder can improve patient integration and legal standing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of vitamin D treatment in chronic GVHD.

Bone marrow transplantation·2011
Same author

[The physiopathology and management of sexual dysfunction in epileptic patients].

Revista de neurologia·2008
Same author

[Epilepsy and sleep as seen on video encephalographic recordings].

Revista de neurologia·2002
Same author

[Epilepsy and permission to drive].

Revista de neurologia·2001
Same author

[Video-EEG description of epileptic seizures].

Revista de neurologia·2000
Same author

[A video-EEG description of non-epileptic paroxysmal seizures].

Revista de neurologia·2000

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry
  • Forensic Science

Context:

  • Epilepsy historically misclassified as madness, impacting legal and social perceptions.
  • Supreme Court jurisprudence in Spain (1976-1995) highlights epilepsy as a common basis for legal absolution.
  • Legal ramifications of epilepsy extend across civil, penal, military, canonical, and labor law.

Purpose:

  • To review historical and current perceptions of epilepsy.
  • To challenge the outdated classification of epilepsy as a form of psychosis or madness.
  • To advocate for the reclassification of epilepsy as a neurological illness.

Summary:

  • Historical views have wrongly associated epilepsy with psychosis and dangerousness, influencing legal judgments.
  • The study critiques the continued perception of epilepsy as a mental illness, impacting legal and social integration.
  • Current legal frameworks often address epilepsy-related issues, underscoring its societal impact.

Impact:

  • Promoting the understanding of epilepsy as a neurological condition, not a mental illness.
  • Facilitating the full social and legal integration of individuals with epilepsy.
  • Informing legal and medical professionals to adopt a more accurate, evidence-based approach to epilepsy.

Related Experiment Videos