Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimised uncertainty in food analysis: application and comparison between four contrasting 'analyte-commodity'

Jennifer A Lyn1, Michael H Ramsey, Roger Wood

  • 1Centre for Environmental Research, School of Chemistry, Physics and Environmental Science, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.

The Analyst
|October 12, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is measurement uncertainty from sampling related to analyte concentration?

Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications·2025
Same author

Estimation and usefulness of measurement uncertainty from sampling at different spatial scales: microns to kilometres.

Environmental geochemistry and health·2024
Same author

Practical Stepwise Approach to Performing Neonatal Brain MR Imaging in the Research Setting.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Comparison of reproducibility precision on mass fraction in some interlaboratory studies of methods of food analysis.

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry·2021
Same author

Effect of cadmium, zinc and substrate heterogeneity on yield, shoot metal concentration and metal uptake by Brassica juncea: implications for human health risk assessment and phytoremediation.

The New phytologist·2021
Same author

Evaluation of uncertainties in in situ and ex situ gamma measurements on land areas with low contamination levels.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2015

The optimised uncertainty (OU) methodology effectively reduces financial losses from misclassification in food analysis. This approach minimizes risks associated with false compliance and false non-compliance, improving regulatory adherence.

Area of Science:

  • Food safety analysis
  • Metrology and uncertainty quantification

Background:

  • Regulatory compliance in food often involves complex analyte-commodity combinations with inherent measurement uncertainties.
  • Misclassification risks, including false compliance and false non-compliance, pose significant financial and safety concerns.
  • Existing methodologies may not fully address regulations with compositional specifications and tolerance limits (USL/LSL).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To adapt and apply the optimised uncertainty (OU) methodology to diverse analyte-commodity scenarios.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of the adapted OU methodology in minimizing financial losses due to misclassification.
  • To assess the application of the Newton-Raphson method for determining optimal uncertainty values.

Main Methods:

  • Application of the optimised uncertainty (OU) methodology across various analyte-commodity combinations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Adaptation of the OU methodology for regulations involving compositional specifications (USL/LSL).
  • Utilisation of the Newton-Raphson method for optimal uncertainty calculations in single-threshold assessments.

    • Main Results:

    • The adapted OU methodology was successfully applied in practice to diverse food commodities.
    • The Newton-Raphson method provided optimal uncertainty values comparable to visual inspection.
    • Application of the OU methodology resulted in an average 65% reduction in expected financial loss across four commodities.

    Conclusions:

    • The optimised uncertainty methodology offers a robust framework for managing risks in food regulatory analysis.
    • The adapted OU approach effectively handles various regulatory requirements, including compositional specifications.
    • Implementing the OU methodology demonstrably reduces financial losses, highlighting its practical benefits in food safety and quality control.