Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distributional assumptions in voxel-based morphometry.

C H Salmond1, J Ashburner, F Vargha-Khadem

  • 1Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Neuroimage
|October 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lesion network mapping of REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2025
Same author

Late-onset swallowing outcomes post-treatment for head and neck cancer in a UK-based population.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2022
Same author

Neocerebellar Crus I Abnormalities Associated with a Speech and Language Disorder Due to a Mutation in FOXP2.

Cerebellum (London, England)·2018
Same author

Frailty Exists in Younger Adults Admitted as Surgical Emergency Leading to Adverse Outcomes.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2017
Same author

Neonatal basal ganglia and thalamic volumes: very preterm birth and 7-year neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Pediatric research·2017
Same author

New tissue priors for improved automated classification of subcortical brain structures on MRI.

NeuroImage·2016
Same journal

Brain-Inspired Large Model Mindreading.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Light on Broken Networks: Resting-State fNIRS as a Tool for Connectivity Mapping.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Criticism-Evoked Rumination Is Linked to Dynamic adjustments of the Left Superficial Amygdala in Adolescents.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

GeNED.ar cohort: Neuroimaging Resource for Aging Studies in an Admixed Population from Argentina.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

DTI-ALPS index correlates with poor neuromodulation outcomes of bilateral STN-DBS in Parkinson's disease patients: a prospective cohort study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Decoding neuronal criticality firing patterns for large brain based EEG models.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis validity depends on error distribution assumptions. Minimal smoothing can cause issues, but 4-mm smoothing in balanced designs is robust, unlike unbalanced designs.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Statistical analysis
  • Brain morphometry

Background:

  • Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) relies on the general linear model for statistical tests.
  • A core assumption for VBM validity is the normal distribution of error terms, typically achieved via data smoothing.
  • Recent interest in minimal smoothing for detecting small-scale regional differences necessitates re-evaluating VBM assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of non-normal error distributions on VBM analysis validity, particularly with minimal smoothing.
  • To determine the minimum smoothing kernel required to ensure valid VBM results under different design conditions.
  • To assess the robustness of VBM statistical tests to violations of normality assumptions.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations were used to evaluate the impact of non-normal error distributions on VBM statistical tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyses were conducted under varying degrees of smoothing (including minimal smoothing) and experimental design types (balanced vs. unbalanced).
  • The frequency of false positives was assessed to determine the validity of the statistical tests.

    • Main Results:

    • Non-normality in error terms can indeed compromise VBM analysis validity.
    • In balanced designs, smoothing with a 4-mm FWHM kernel sufficiently mitigates non-normality issues, ensuring test validity.
    • Unbalanced designs are more susceptible to normality violations, leading to increased false positives, even with 4-mm or 8-mm smoothing, especially in single-subject vs. group comparisons.

    Conclusions:

    • Researchers using VBM must carefully consider smoothing levels and experimental design balance.
    • A 4-mm FWHM smoothing kernel is recommended for balanced VBM designs to ensure statistical validity.
    • Caution is advised for VBM analyses with unbalanced designs, as they may yield unreliable results due to non-normality issues.