Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Advance directives: a third option.

A Browne1, W J Sullivan

  • 1Division of Health-Care Ethics, The University of British Columbia, Canada.

Annals (Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada)
|October 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'Our culture makes us strong': Understanding and working with community strengths among Aboriginal people in western Sydney.

Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals·2024
Same author

Differential expression of IL-8 and IL-8 receptors in benign, borderline and malignant ovarian epithelial tumours.

Cytokine·2013
Same author

The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice: part 3, five-year survival.

British dental journal·2012
Same author

The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 2, early failure.

British dental journal·2011
Same author

[Not Available].

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 1, baseline data.

British dental journal·2010
Same journal

Medical-ethics teaching in Canadian physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training programs.

Annals (Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada)·2004
Same journal

Learning from the experience of others: ethical issues surrounding the use of clinical data for teaching and other professional activities.

Annals (Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada)·2004
Same journal

Considerations for research ethics boards in evaluating qualitative studies: lessons from an ethnographic study with adolescent females.

Annals (Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada)·2004
Same journal

Ethics in qualitative health research.

Annals (Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada)·2004
Same journal

Interactions of staff and residents with pharmaceutical industry: a survey of psychiatric training program policies.

Annals (Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada)·2004
Same journal

Physicians' ethical responsibilities.

Annals (Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada)·2004
See all related articles

Advance directives can extend autonomy for incapacitated individuals. A combined approach, focusing on outcomes rather than specific interventions, better addresses the needs of all individuals, including the healthy.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Law
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Autonomy is central to healthcare decision-making and can be extended through advance directives during incapacity.
  • Current advance directives often focus on prohibiting interventions, which may not align with the preferences of all patient groups.
  • The healthy and younger populations have distinct concerns regarding medical interventions, often prioritizing outcomes over specific procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the limitations of traditional advance directives for diverse populations.
  • To propose an improved model of advance directives that addresses the concerns of both healthy and chronically ill individuals.
  • To enhance the ability of advance directives to reflect patient autonomy during periods of incapacity.

Main Methods:

Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of existing advance directive frameworks.
  • Review of patient preferences concerning medical interventions and outcomes.
  • Development of a combined instructional and proxy directive model.

Main Results:

  • Traditional advance directives may not adequately capture the preferences of healthy individuals, who are more outcome-oriented.
  • A combined instructional and proxy directive, emphasizing desired ends over specific means, offers a more comprehensive approach.
  • The proposed model aims to provide greater certainty and better align with diverse patient values.

Conclusions:

  • Advance directives are crucial for maintaining autonomy but require adaptation to meet varied patient needs.
  • A hybrid approach combining instructional and proxy elements, with a focus on outcomes, is recommended for broader applicability.
  • This refined strategy ensures advance directives better serve individuals across different health statuses and life stages.