Sequential versus simultaneous biventricular resynchronization for severe heart failure: evaluation by tissue Doppler

Peter Sogaard1, Henrik Egeblad, Anders K Pedersen

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus, Denmark. psogaard@dadlnet.dk

Circulation
|October 16, 2002
PubMed

Insights

Sequential cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) significantly enhances heart function by optimizing biventricular pacing delays. This approach improves both systolic and diastolic performance in heart failure patients.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing improves heart failure outcomes.
  • Simultaneous pacing is standard, but optimal timing remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate sequential CRT using tissue tracking and 3D echocardiography.
  • To determine the impact of individualized interventricular delay programming on cardiac performance.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty patients with heart failure and bundle-branch block underwent CRT.
  • Tissue tracking and 3D echocardiography assessed myocardial contraction before and after pacing.
  • Multiple interventricular delays were tested to find optimal sequential programming.

Main Results:

  • Sequential CRT significantly reduced delayed longitudinal contraction (DLC) and increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%).
  • Optimal sequential CRT further improved DLC and LVEF% compared to simultaneous CRT.
  • Three-month follow-up showed sustained improvements in LVEF% with sequential CRT.
  • Sequential CRT increased diastolic filling time by 7%.

Conclusions:

  • Sequential CRT offers significant advantages over simultaneous CRT for both systolic and diastolic performance.
  • Tissue tracking is effective for optimizing interventricular delay in CRT.
Abstract