Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using effectiveness studies for prescribing research, part 1.

N Freemantle1, J Eastaugh

  • 1Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, UK.

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
|October 18, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preferences for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products: Understanding the Published Literature on the Value of Innovative Health Interventions.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2025
Same author

Effectiveness and safety of menopause treatments: pitfalls of available evidence and future research need.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2024
Same author

Conceptualizing a model for European health systems: the institutional framework.

Internal and emergency medicine·2023
Same author

Antidepressants Trial in Parkinson's Disease (ADepT-PD): protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial on the effectiveness of escitalopram and nortriptyline on depressive symptoms in Parkinson's disease.

BMC neurology·2022
Same author

Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab for Treatment of Adult Atopic Dermatitis.

Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology·2021
Same author

Sociodemographic inequalities in the management of depression in adults aged 55 and over: an analysis of English primary care data.

Psychological medicine·2017
Same journal

Impact of pharmacist-initiated educational interventions on improving medication reconciliation practice in geriatric inpatients during hospital admission in Vietnam.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
Same journal

Evaluation of off-label anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and steroid implant medication uses in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion in Turkey.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
Same journal

A descriptive analysis of pharmacological management of aggression and/or agitation in patients with traumatic brain injury in a Southwest Virginia inpatient population.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
Same journal

Effects of caregiver counselling on medication persistence and adherence in patients with dementia at a pharmacist-managed clinic: A pilot study.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
Same journal

The 50% and 95% effective doses of remimazolam tosilate with adjuvant sufentanil for sedation in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing oesophagogastric varices screening endoscopy.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
Same journal

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor combined with intravenous immunoglobulin and heparin for treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion: A two-centre, retrospective, cohort study.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
See all related articles

Evaluating healthcare interventions requires formal rules. Clinical audit and randomized controlled evaluations are crucial for assessing practice changes, prioritizing small-scale experiments and qualitative data before large trials.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Practice Improvement
  • Intervention Science

Background:

  • Pharmaceutical evaluation is highly conceptualized.
  • Lack of formal rules for assessing intervention effects on practice.
  • Need for structured evaluation frameworks in healthcare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a structured approach for evaluating healthcare interventions.
  • To emphasize the importance of clinical audit and randomized controlled evaluations.
  • To advocate for phased experimental designs, including qualitative and quantitative methods.

Main Methods:

  • Argument for clinical audit as a prerequisite for interventions.
  • Preference for randomized controlled evaluations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of small-scale experiments for concept validation.
  • Consideration of open vs. blind assessments.
  • Integration of qualitative and quantitative appraisal.

    • Main Results:

    • Clinical audit is identified as a key factor before intervention.
    • Randomized controlled evaluations are deemed preferable.
    • Small-scale experiments are necessary to validate intervention concepts.
    • Qualitative data is important during development, followed by quantitative impact appraisal.

    Conclusions:

    • A formal, phased approach is needed for evaluating healthcare interventions.
    • Combining qualitative and quantitative methods enhances evaluation rigor.
    • Structured evaluation improves the assessment of practice-based interventions.