Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2026

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers
Published on: January 5, 2024
The effects of cash and lottery incentives on mailed surveys to physicians: a randomized trial
Gabriel M Leung1, Lai Ming Ho, Moon Fai Chan
1Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. gmleung@hku.hk
Insights
Offering incentives significantly boosts mailed survey response rates, particularly for physicians. Cash incentives proved more effective than lottery incentives, with a $20 cash reward being the most cost-effective option.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Low response rates in mailed surveys, especially among physicians, pose a significant challenge.
- Effective strategies are needed to improve participation in health research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of cash and lottery incentives on mailed survey response rates.
- To determine the most cost-effective incentive strategy for improving survey participation.
Main Methods:
- A randomized trial involving 4,850 subjects receiving a mailed survey.
- Interventions included no incentive, varying levels of cash (HKD $10, $20, $40), or lottery entry (HKD $1,000, $2,000, $4,000).
Main Results:
- Incentives increased response rates compared to no incentive (19.8% vs. 16.8%, P =.012).
- Cash incentives were more effective than lottery incentives (27.3% vs. 19.4%, P =.017).
- The $20 cash incentive was the most cost-effective intervention per responder.
Conclusions:
- Cash incentives, particularly at the $20 level, are effective and cost-efficient for improving mailed survey response rates.
- Further research into incentive strategies for epidemiologic studies is recommended.
Abstract:
Low response rates, especially among physicians, are a common problem in mailed survey research. We conducted a randomized trial to examine the effects of cash and lottery incentives on response rates. A total of 4,850 subjects were randomized to one of three interventions accompanying a mailed survey-no incentive (n = 1,700), cash payment [three levels of Hong Kong dollars (HKD) $10, $20, and $40; N = 50 in each subgroup], or entry into a lottery (three levels of HKD$1,000, $2,000, and $4,000; N = 1,000 in each subgroup) on receipt of the completed questionnaire. The response rates were higher among those offered incentives than those without (19.8% vs. 16.8%, P =.012). Cash was the more effective incentive compared to lottery (27.3% vs. 19.4%, P =.017). Response also increased substantially between the first and second mailings (14.2% vs. 18.8%, P >.001). In addition, those with specialist qualifications were more willing to participate in mailed surveys. We found no significant differences in response outcomes among the various incentive arms. Cash reward at the $20 level was the most cost-effective intervention, in terms of cost per responder. Further systematic examination of the effects of different incentive strategies in epidemiologic studies should be encouraged.
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
The Placebo Effect
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blind Procedures
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
What is an Experiment?
