Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Disability examinations: a look at the Social Security Disability Income System.

David N Duddleston1, Joseph W Blackston, Marshall J Bouldin

  • 1Department of Medicine, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216-4505, USA. dduddleston@medicine.umsmed.edu

The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
|October 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical dilemmas in coding domestic violence.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2009
Same author

Identifying barriers to the adoption of new technology in rural hospitals: a case report.

Perspectives in health information management·2007
Same author

Improving patient safety through information technology.

Perspectives in health information management·2007
Same author

Response to editorial by Dr. Dwalia South.

Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association·2007
Same author

Addressing disparities in cardiovascular risk through community-based interventions.

Ethnicity & disease·2007
Same author

Differences in glucose tolerance between fixed-dose antihypertensive drug combinations in people with metabolic syndrome: response to Bakris et al.

Diabetes care·2007
Same journal

Providers' Perspectives on Hospital-Based Tobacco Treatment Efforts.

The American journal of the medical sciences·2026
Same journal

In Memoriam: Maurice A. Mufson, MD, MACP.

The American journal of the medical sciences·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia patients admitted to the intensive care unit within 100 days of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The American journal of the medical sciences·2026
Same journal

Association Between Reverse Triiodothyronine and Cardiac Complications in Patients with Uncontrolled Graves' Disease.

The American journal of the medical sciences·2026
Same journal

Chlorthalidone vs. hydrochlorothiazide in hypertension management: Lessons for guiding clinical practice.

The American journal of the medical sciences·2026
Same journal

The impact of COVID-19 on alcohol-associated hepatitis and alcohol-associated cirrhosis.

The American journal of the medical sciences·2026
See all related articles

Physicians play a critical role in disability evaluations, requiring a neutral approach to assess patient impairments and work history accurately. Thorough documentation, separating findings from opinions, is essential for fair disability determinations.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Medicine
  • Social Security Law
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • Disability income protection is a vital component of the U.S. worker safety net, with Social Security and private insurance options available.
  • Physicians bear significant responsibility in evaluating disability claims, impacting both policyholders and taxpayers.
  • High costs associated with disability claims necessitate accurate and objective medical assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the physician's role and responsibilities in the disability evaluation process.
  • To emphasize the importance of a neutral and objective approach in assessing patient disability.
  • To guide physicians in documenting disability claims effectively for adjudicating bodies.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewing the physician's responsibilities in disability assessments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Highlighting the need for a neutral physician attitude towards patients seeking disability.
  • Emphasizing the importance of detailed patient work history and functional limitations.
  • Discussing the role of treatment options in determining maximal medical improvement.
  • Stressing the separation of objective findings from subjective opinions in medical records.

    • Main Results:

    • A neutral physician attitude facilitates objective fact-collection regarding patient impairments.
    • Understanding a patient's work history is crucial for establishing appropriate work or home limitations.
    • Physician knowledge of treatments aids in assessing maximal medical improvement.
    • Separating medical findings from opinions in records ensures clarity for adjudicators.
    • Awareness of symptom magnification and depression is vital for accurate disability perception.

    Conclusions:

    • Physicians must maintain neutrality and objectivity when evaluating disability claims.
    • Comprehensive documentation including history, findings, and treatment review is essential.
    • Distinguishing objective medical evidence from subjective opinions is critical for fair disability adjudication.
    • Understanding potential confounders like symptom magnification and depression improves assessment accuracy.