Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. preliminary pathologic evaluation.

Gaëalle Fromont1, Bertrand Guillonneau, Pierre Validire

  • 1Department of Pathology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.

Urology
|October 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of Misplaced Endometrial Glands and Stroma in the Myometrium of Foetal Uteri Evocative of Developmental Adenomyosis.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Correction: Gogusev et al. Idiopathic Abdominal Wall Endometrioma: Case Report with Investigation of the Pathological, Molecular Cytogenetic and Cell Growth Features In Vitro. <i>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</i> 2025, <i>26</i>, 775.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Expression of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor in Von Hippel-Lindau Associated Tumors and Cysts: An Immunohistochemical Study.

Journal of kidney cancer and VHL·2025
Same author

Idiopathic Abdominal Wall Endometrioma: Case Report with Investigation of the Pathological, Molecular Cytogenetic and Cell Growth Features In Vitro.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Final Results of the ANDROCAN Study: Histopathological Characteristics and Biochemical Recurrence at 5 Years of Localized Prostate Cancer According to Preoperative Gonadal Status.

European urology oncology·2024
Same author

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Experience and Pathological Quality: Are They Always Linked?

Journal of endourology·2023
Same journal

"Editorial Comment on "Vaginal Estrogen Prescription is Associated with Reduced Rates of Serious Adverse Outcomes in Women of All Age Groups With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: An Epic Cosmos Database Analysis".

Urology·2026
Same journal

The True Oral History of Buccal Mucosal Grafts for Male Urethral Stricture Repair.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Preventing Postpartum Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Clinical Evidence and Policy Gaps in U.S. Coverage of Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Editorial Comment on "Through the Eyes of the Applicant: A Qualitative Study of the Urology Residency Match".

Urology·2026
Same journal

Editorial Comment on "A Histopathologic Assessment of Prostate Ductal Anatomy in Relation to Micro-Ultrasound".

Urology·2026
Same journal

Same-Day Discharge Following Multiport Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Prospective Feasibility Study of Outcomes, Costs, and Post-Discharge Healthcare Utilization.

Urology·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy shows a significant decrease in positive surgical margins compared to the open retropubic approach, especially for localized cancers. This suggests the laparoscopic method is oncologically safe when performed by experienced surgeons.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Growing interest in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).
  • Limited carcinologic data, particularly surgical margin status, for LRP.
  • Need to compare oncologic outcomes of LRP with traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze and compare the oncologic results of LRP versus RRP.
  • Specifically evaluate and compare surgical margin status between the two approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of LRP (2000) and RRP (1994-1997) by the same surgeons.
  • Matched analysis of 139 patients per group based on preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA).
  • Comparison of pathologic data including Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin status.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Similar prostate weight and lymph node positivity between LRP and RRP groups.
  • No difference in radical prostatectomy Gleason score or pathologic stage.
  • Statistically significant reduction in positive surgical margins with LRP (P <0.02), especially for pT2 cancers.
  • Significantly decreased rate of positive apical margins in organ-confined disease for LRP.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, when performed by experienced surgeons, does not increase the risk of positive surgical margins.
  • LRP demonstrates favorable oncologic outcomes comparable to RRP, with an advantage in margin status for localized disease.