Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why Johnnie Can't Apply Neuroscience: Testing Alternative Hypotheses Using Performance-Based Assessment.

Brian E. Mavis1, Kathryn L. Lovell, Karen S. Ogle

  • 1Office of Medical Education, Research and Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 1316, USA; E-mail:

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Theory and Practice
|October 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Decision-making in programmatic assessment is only a challenge when we make it one.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Historicizing health professions education research: history as a strategic analytic resource.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing workplace collaboration and learning between resident doctors and senior nurses: a scoping review.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Grave lessons: a guide to historiographical research in health professions education.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of inquiry in medicine and nursing using Dewey's perspective.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

"Teaching is important, but it's not important": a qualitative study of teacher identity among early-career academics in health professions.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026

Medical students often know information but struggle to apply it in clinical scenarios. Performance assessments reveal that knowledge application, skill focus, and time decay impact medical student competence.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Skills Assessment

Background:

  • Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are crucial for assessing medical students.
  • Performance-based assessments are vital for evaluating practical application of medical knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate factors affecting medical students' performance in neurologic cases.
  • To test hypotheses on knowledge application, skill decay, and case complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Two cohorts of second-year medical students underwent modified performance-based assessments.
  • Evaluated knowledge application, skill performance, time decay, and case complexity.

Main Results:

  • Students possessed knowledge but struggled with application in unstructured formats.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Physical examination skills were present but lacked appropriate focus.
  • Evidence of knowledge and skill decay over time was observed.
  • Case complexity influenced performance in certain domains.

    • Conclusions:

    • Multiple factors, including knowledge application and skill decay, influence medical student performance.
    • Assessment design must consider these factors to accurately evaluate competence.