Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tiered testing strategies--acute local toxicity.

Katherine A Stitzel1

  • 1Human Safety, Proctor & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

ILAR Journal
|October 22, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Animal testing for skin irritation is no longer necessary, with available methods. Improvements in eye irritation testing are also available, but animal use reduction and pain mitigation are still needed.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proposed new classification scheme for chemical injury to the human eye.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2006
Same author

The international symposium on regulatory testing and animal welfare: recommendations on best scientific practices for acute systemic toxicity testing.

ILAR journal·2002
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • In vitro testing
  • Animal welfare

Background:

  • Significant research has focused on developing non-animal alternatives for eye and skin irritation testing.
  • Historically, there has been an expectation for straightforward non-animal test development in these areas.
  • Despite decades of research, in vitro methods for assessing skin irritation alone remain challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current practices and recommendations for reducing animal use in eye and skin irritation testing.
  • To assess the necessity of animal use in current skin and eye irritation assessments.
  • To identify opportunities for improving non-animal methods and reducing animal distress.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current recommendations and industry practices for skin and eye irritation testing.
  • Analysis of scientific progress in understanding irritation mechanisms.
  • Evaluation of available non-animal testing methodologies.

Main Results:

  • Animal use for skin irritation testing is largely unnecessary with current methodologies, except for regulatory compliance.
  • Scientifically sound improvements exist for current animal-based eye irritation tests.
  • Recent advances in understanding eye irritation mechanisms offer potential for improved in vitro methods.

Conclusions:

  • Animal testing for skin irritation is not required, given current validated methods, barring regulatory constraints.
  • Improvements to animal eye irritation protocols can reduce pain and distress.
  • Further development and validation of non-animal methods are needed to fully replace animal testing for eye and skin irritation endpoints.

Related Experiment Videos