Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Future improvements: replacement in vitro methods.

Michael Balls1

  • 1European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Varese, Italy.

ILAR Journal
|October 22, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethics and Controversies in Animal Subjects Research and Impact on Clinical Decision-Making.

Anesthesiology clinics·2024
Same author

60 Years of the 3Rs symposium: Lessons learned and the road ahead.

ALTEX·2024
Same author

<i>Alternatives to Laboratory Animals</i>: Trends in <i>Replacement</i> and the Three Rs.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2022
Same author

Clinical impact of high-profile animal-based research reported in the UK national press.

BMJ open science·2022
Same author

It's Time to Include Harm to Humans in Harm-Benefit Analysis - But How to Do It, That is the Question.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2021
Same author

It's Time to Reconsider <i>The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique</i>.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2020
Same journal

Laboratory Codes in Nomenclature and Scientific Communication (Advancing Organism Nomenclature in Scientific Communication to Improve Research Reporting and Reproducibility).

ILAR journal·2022
Same journal

History of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Institute for Laboratory Animal Research.

ILAR journal·2022
Same journal

History of the International Council for Laboratory Animal Science.

ILAR journal·2022
Same journal

International Standardized Nomenclature for Outbred Stocks of Laboratory Animals.

ILAR journal·2022
Same journal

Rapid Response by Laboratory Animal Research Institutions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Key Lessons Learned From a 2021 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Workshop.

ILAR journal·2022
Same journal

Beyond the Laboratory: Emerging Landscape of Animal Studies - the Influence of National Academies of Sciences Activities and Publications.

ILAR journal·2022
See all related articles

Advancing regulatory toxicology requires novel, mechanistically-based tests. Developing new methods, leveraging omics and computational tools, is crucial for improved human and environmental protection.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Biotechnology
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Current regulatory toxicology relies on animal procedures.
  • There is a need for improved methods for human and environmental protection.
  • New approaches are essential for advancing toxicological assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the requirements for developing new regulatory toxicology tests.
  • To emphasize the importance of mechanistic understanding and new technologies.
  • To discuss the validation process for new toxicological methods.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on mechanistic understanding of toxic phenomena.
  • Utilize advancements in cell and molecular biology, omics (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics), and computational systems.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchEuropean Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employ rigorous validation strategies, including prevalidation and independent assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • New tests must be mechanistically relevant and incorporate modern biological and computational tools.
    • Genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics offer future opportunities for test development.
    • Validation is critical, requiring a case-by-case approach and effective independent assessment procedures.

    Conclusions:

    • Revolutionizing regulatory toxicology necessitates new, mechanistically-grounded tests.
    • Integration of advanced biological and computational methods is key to developing predictive and relevant assays.
    • Standardized, yet flexible, validation frameworks are essential for regulatory acceptance of novel methods.