Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Microdialysis of Ethanol During Operant Ethanol Self-administration and Ethanol Determination by Gas Chromatography
Published on: September 5, 2012
Monte Carlo simulation of an ethanol pharmacokinetic model
David Whitmire1, Larry Cornelius, Paula Whitmire
1Department of Chemical Engineering, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, Tennessee 38505, USA. dwhitmire@tntech.edu
Background:
One challenge of using even relatively simple pharmacokinetic models is valuation of model parameters. Unknown model parameter values can be determined by fitting the model to measured data. Goals of the present study were to (1) obtain ethanol pharmacokinetic data from a cohort of dogs, (2) propose a physiologic ethanol pharmacokinetic model, (3) and perform Monte Carlo simulation to determine model parameter values. The rationale for the particular model proposed here was to account for the interrelationship between blood ethanol concentration and gastrointestinal physiology.
Methods:
To each of five fasted dogs, 1 g of ethanol/kg body weight was administered as a gavage of 20% w/v ethanol solution. Developed was an ethanol pharmacokinetic model that comprised a gastric emptying mechanism, a body water compartment, ethanol diffusion through the stomach mucosa, gastric alcohol dehydrogenase (GADH) oxidation of ethanol, diffusion through the small intestine epithelia to the villi, a countercurrent exchanger model of the villi, and liver alcohol dehydrogenase oxidation of ethanol. Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate model parameter values and standard deviations by minimization of the chi function.
Results:
Fitting the experimental data to the model using Monte Carlo simulation yielded reasonable values for model parameters. The model predicted that the capacity for ethanol absorption in the intestine was 6.79-fold greater than the ethanol absorption capacity in the stomach. The model indicated that 23.8 +/- 8.3% of the ethanol dose was actually absorbed in the stomach, and an insignificant amount of ethanol was metabolized by GADH.
Conclusions:
Ethanol metabolism by GADH is insignificant in the present case. The blood ethanol profile was strongly determined by gastric emptying. Differences between experimental data and simulation results largely result from the gastric emptying model selected. Therefore, accuracy of the complete pharmacokinetic model can be improved significantly by improving the gastric emptying model.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal assumptions,...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Michaelis-Menten Equation
Vmax represents the maximum achievable process rate, while KM, known as the Michaelis constant, signifies the drug concentration at which the process rate reaches half its maximum. This relationship between Vmax, KM, and Cp gives rise to three distinct...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Emax Drug–Concentration Effect Model

