Cortical and subcortical networks underlying syncopated and synchronized coordination revealed using fMRI. Functional...

Inherent differences in difficulty between on the beat (synchronization) and off the beat (syncopation) coordination modes are well known. Synchronization is typically quite easy and, once begun, may be carried out with little apparent attention demand. Syncopation tends to be difficult, even though it has been described as a simple, phase-shifted version of a synchronized pattern. We hypothesize that syncopation, unlike synchronization, is organized on a cycle-by-cycle basis, thereby imposing much greater preparatory and attentional demands on the central nervous system. To test this hypothesis we used fMRI to measure the BOLD response during syncopation and synchronization to an auditory stimulus. We found that the distribution of cortical and subcortical areas involved in intentionally coordinating movement with an external metronome depends on the timing pattern employed. Both synchronized and syncopated patterns require activation of contralateral sensorimotor and caudal supplementary motor cortices as well as the (primarily ipsilateral) cerebellum. Moving off the beat, however, requires not only additional activation of the cerebellum but also the recruitment of another network comprised of the basal ganglia, dorsolateral premotor, rostral supplementary motor, prefrontal, and temporal association cortices. No areas were found to be more active during synchronization than syncopation. The functional role of the cortical and subcortical regions areas involved in syncopation supports the hypothesis that whereas synchronization requires little preparation and monitoring, syncopated movements are planned and executed individually on each perception-action cycle.