[Life-history variation within a taxon: a comparative analysis of birds and mammals]

Most studies on life-history evolution discuss the necessity of distinguishing between extrinsic and intrinsic sources of variability in life-history traits. I use log/log plots of yearly neonate production in daugters (b) versus adult mortality (Ma) for 75 bird species and 88 mammal species to compare graphically life-history "fields" arranged by these selective forces along a "slow-fast continuum". Under the assumptions of steady-state and linear relationship between adult mortality and reproductive effort, as well as between juvenile survival and relative neonate weight, it is possible to place additional axes in the two-dimentional plot, and to predict covariations among demographic and individual growth traits. The functional regression analysis shows, that the assumptions are completely fulfilled, at least for birds, but mammals show nonlinear relationship between adult mortality and reproductive effort. This can be explained by peculiarities of metabolism and parental care in small mammals with high reproductive output. Hence, for birds the axis of relative neonate weight approximately coincides in direction with the juvenile survivorship axis, but this is not a case for mammals. In both taxa, the relative neonate weight is an invariant in relation to fecundity and adult mortality (but not in relation to adult body weight). This important feature, together with other intrinsic (energetic and phylogenetic) constraints, explains well-documented close covariations among traits, even when the effect of body size is factored out. It is argued that life-history and body size variations in birds and mammals mainly depend on a pattern of temporal resource deficiency, although this impact cannot be separated from that of extrinsic juvenile mortality.