Differences in stunting prevalences calculated from two similar growth references may be large and inconsistent in

C L Eckhardt1, L S Adair

  • 1Department of Nutrition, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University Square, CB #8120, 123 West Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3997, USA. cara_eckhardt@unc.edu

Annals of Human Biology
|October 25, 2002
PubMed

Insights

The 2000 CDC growth references offer improved accuracy for assessing child stunting compared to the 1977 NCHS references, particularly in undernourished populations. Researchers should be aware of potential challenges when transitioning to the new growth references.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Public Health
  • Nutrition Science

Background:

  • The 1977 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) references were internationally recommended for child growth assessment.
  • Limitations in the 1977 NCHS references led to the development of new growth references by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2000.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare length-for-age Z-scores (LA Z-scores) and height-for-age Z-scores (HA Z-scores) between the 1977 NCHS and 2000 CDC growth references.
  • To evaluate age-specific stunting prevalences in an undernourished population using both reference sets.
  • To identify differences in growth metric calculations and stunting rates between the two growth references.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from over 2000 children participating in the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Study in the Philippines.
  • Collected anthropometric data bimonthly from birth to 2 years, and at ages 8.5, 11.5, 15 (girls), and 16 (boys) years.
  • Calculated Z-scores and stunting prevalences using both 1977 NCHS and 2000 CDC references for comparative analysis.

Main Results:

  • Length-for-age Z-scores were generally lower with the 1977 references, resulting in higher stunting prevalences from birth to 2 years.
  • Height-for-age Z-scores showed inconsistent differences between references after 8.5 years of age, varying by sex and magnitude.
  • Some crossover in Z-scores and stunting prevalences was observed between the two reference systems.

Conclusions:

  • The 1977 NCHS and 2000 CDC growth references yield different results when applied to undernourished children.
  • The 2000 CDC growth references represent an improvement for assessing child growth and stunting.
  • Transitioning to new growth references presents challenges for researchers and field workers that require careful consideration.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Nature and Nurture01:10

Nature and Nurture

Many human characteristics, like height, are shaped by both nature—in other words, by our genes—and by nurture, or our environment. For example, chronic stress during childhood inhibits the production of growth hormones and consequently reduces bone growth and height. Scientists estimate that 70-90% of variation in height is due to genetic differences among individuals, and 10-30% of variation in height is due to differences in the environments that individuals experience, such as differences...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation02:32

Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation

In the field of psychology, there are several ways to organize measurements of a trait, feature, or characteristic (i.e., variables). Qualitative data, such as ethnicity, can be tabulated into a frequency count to provide information about the proportion, as well as the variety of groups in a sample or population. On the other hand, researchers can perform a wider set of calculations on quantitative data. The mean, mode, and median, for instance, are central tendency measures to identify a...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption01:23

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption

Understanding the physiological differences in the pediatric population is crucial for effective pharmacotherapy. Neonates, infants, and children exhibit significant variations in gastric pH, gastric emptying time, intestinal transit time, and biliary function. These variations profoundly affect oral drug absorption, necessitating a nuanced approach to pediatric dosing.Neonates present with a unique physiological profile, having a gastric pH greater than 4 and faster and more irregular gastric...