Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children
Published on: August 22, 2012
Differences in stunting prevalences calculated from two similar growth references may be large and inconsistent in
1Department of Nutrition, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University Square, CB #8120, 123 West Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3997, USA. cara_eckhardt@unc.edu
Insights
The 2000 CDC growth references offer improved accuracy for assessing child stunting compared to the 1977 NCHS references, particularly in undernourished populations. Researchers should be aware of potential challenges when transitioning to the new growth references.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Nutrition Science
Background:
- The 1977 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) references were internationally recommended for child growth assessment.
- Limitations in the 1977 NCHS references led to the development of new growth references by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2000.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare length-for-age Z-scores (LA Z-scores) and height-for-age Z-scores (HA Z-scores) between the 1977 NCHS and 2000 CDC growth references.
- To evaluate age-specific stunting prevalences in an undernourished population using both reference sets.
- To identify differences in growth metric calculations and stunting rates between the two growth references.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from over 2000 children participating in the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Study in the Philippines.
- Collected anthropometric data bimonthly from birth to 2 years, and at ages 8.5, 11.5, 15 (girls), and 16 (boys) years.
- Calculated Z-scores and stunting prevalences using both 1977 NCHS and 2000 CDC references for comparative analysis.
Main Results:
- Length-for-age Z-scores were generally lower with the 1977 references, resulting in higher stunting prevalences from birth to 2 years.
- Height-for-age Z-scores showed inconsistent differences between references after 8.5 years of age, varying by sex and magnitude.
- Some crossover in Z-scores and stunting prevalences was observed between the two reference systems.
Conclusions:
- The 1977 NCHS and 2000 CDC growth references yield different results when applied to undernourished children.
- The 2000 CDC growth references represent an improvement for assessing child growth and stunting.
- Transitioning to new growth references presents challenges for researchers and field workers that require careful consideration.
Background:
In 2000, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a set of growth references that address limitations of the internationally recommended 1977 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) references.
Aim:
This study compares length-for-age Z-scores (LA Z-scores), height-for-age Z-scores (HA Z-scores), and age-specific stunting prevalences of undernourished children using the 1977 NCHS versus the 2000 CDC references.
Subjects And Methods:
Data come from > 2000 children from the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Study in the Philippines. Anthropometric data were collected bimonthly from birth to 2 years, at 8.5 and 11.5 years, and at 15 years in girls and 16 years in boys. Z-scores and stunting prevalences are compared between references.
Results:
LA Z-scores were generally lower using the 1977 references, and stunting prevalences were higher from 0 to 2 years, with some crossover. Differences in HA Z-scores after 8.5 years of age were inconsistent in both direction and magnitude by reference and sex, with additional crossover.
Conclusions:
When applied to an undernourished population, the two references in question perform differently, with inconsistencies in direction and magnitude of Z-scores and stunting prevalences. The 2000 CDC growth references are clearly an improved tool. However, there are challenges inherent in switching to a new reference that will require the attention of researchers and field workers.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Regression Toward the Mean
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption

