Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risk characterization: principles and practice.

Pamela R D Williams1, Dennis J Paustenbach

  • 1Exponent, Boulder, Colorado 80301, USA. pwilliams@exponent.com

Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part B, Critical Reviews
|October 25, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The formaldehyde dispute - Part A: acute and chronic inhalation toxicity and the evolution of scientific knowledge.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same author

Risk assessment of trace hydrazine in a 2020 bottled water-associated nonviral hepatitis outbreak.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same author

Exposure-response analysis of recent epidemiological data: Proposed risk based occupational exposure limits for various mineral types of asbestos.

Chemico-biological interactions·2025
Same author

A risk assessment of mechanics who changed chrysotile asbestos containing brakes and other vehicle components in the 1950s-early 2000s era: an update on the 2004 evaluation.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2025
Same author

An evaluation of trends for mesothelioma mortality in American women: Addressing the content of a recent Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).

Toxicology and industrial health·2024
Same author

Occupational exposures to asbestos in the steel industry: An analysis of the AISI sampling campaign (1989-1997).

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2024
Same journal

Ecotoxicological pathways overlooked: a critical evaluation of the baseline ecological risk assessment and potential natural resource injury from Libby Amphibole Asbestos.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews·2026
Same journal

The northern fulmar as a sentinel species for monitoring the environmental health impacts of plastic exposure.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews·2026
Same journal

Health benefit considerations for the development of fish advisory guidelines for PFOS.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews·2026
Same journal

From histological and molecular pathology to the inclusion of antibody-drug conjugates in clinical practice against ovarian cancers: Mechanisms of action and pharmacological safety.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews·2026
Same journal

Mode of action (MOA) for nasal tumors induced by methyl isothiocyanate (MITC) in Sprague Dawley rats.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews·2026
Same journal

Investigation of mode-of-action and human relevance of cumene-induced mouse liver tumors.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews·2026
See all related articles

Effective risk characterization integrates dose-response data with exposure estimates to assess health and environmental risks. This review synthesizes literature to improve risk communication and understanding, addressing uncertainties and decision-making processes.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health Sciences
  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Risk characterization is crucial for understanding human health and environmental risks.
  • This step often receives inadequate attention, leading to misinterpretation of risk assessment findings.
  • Insufficient discussion of uncertainties and limitations can create false impressions of accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive analysis of the risk characterization process.
  • To integrate and synthesize published literature on conducting and reporting risk characterizations.
  • To improve the clarity and meaningfulness of risk information for a broad audience.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of published works on risk characterization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of eight key topics within the risk characterization process.
  • Inclusion of examples and citations for relevant papers.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified common shortcomings in risk characterizations, including lack of interpretation and inadequate uncertainty discussion.
    • Detailed the objective, guidance, components, criteria, descriptors, quantification methods, uncertainties, and decision-making in risk characterization.
    • Provided insights into international practices of risk characterization.

    Conclusions:

    • Improved risk characterization is essential for accurate risk assessment and informed decision-making.
    • Addressing uncertainties and clearly communicating findings enhances the utility of risk assessments.
    • Standardized approaches and comprehensive reporting are needed globally.