Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing sources of variability in microarray gene expression data.

Susan E Spruill1, Jun Lu, Sarah Hardy

  • 1DNA Sciences Laboratories, Morrisville, NC, USA. sspruill@pozen.com

Biotechniques
|October 26, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Doubling down on forensic twin studies.

PLoS genetics·2018
Same author

New Method Application for Marker-Trait Association Studies in Plants: Partial Least Square Regression Aids Detection of Simultaneous Correlations.

Agricultural research & technology : open access journal·2018
Same author

A genome-wide study of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium with next generation sequence data.

Human genetics·2017
Same author

Letter to editor in response to editorial by Risinger et al.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2014
Same author

Genetic variants associated with development of TMD and its intermediate phenotypes: the genetic architecture of TMD in the OPPERA prospective cohort study.

The journal of pain·2013
Same author

A novel method to identify high order gene-gene interactions in genome-wide association studies: gene-based MDR.

BMC bioinformatics·2012
Same journal

Investigating the interactomic landscape of survival motor neuron (SMN) and the SMNΔ7 truncated protein.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Antigen retrieval-immunofluorescence on free floating sections to visualize the liver lobule and its cellular makeup.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Special approach of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for transgene stability of a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Strand-specific quantification of L1 ORF0 and related transcripts by multiplex reverse transcription with tagged primers.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Why and when should we choose digital PCR?

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Quantitative and unbiased lung alveolar septum assessment in an LPS experimental mouse model using 2D-spatial correlation image analysis from hematoxylin and eosin slides.

BioTechniques·2026
See all related articles

Replicating microarray experiments is crucial for validating genomic research findings. Understanding and minimizing variability in microarray data ensures reliable results for data integration and quality assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Microarray experiments are widely used in genomic research.
  • The reproducibility and quality of microarray data are often questioned.
  • Integrating microarray data with other molecular databases requires reliable data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the question of microarray experiment reliability without replication.
  • To establish methods for measuring the validity and quality of microarray data.
  • To discuss sources of variability in microarray experiments and suggest minimization strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from a feasibility test microarray experiment.
  • Partitioned and quantified various sources of variation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed reproducibility to assess data quality.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified and quantified key sources of variability in microarray experiments.
    • Demonstrated the importance of reproducibility for data validation.
    • Provided insights into factors affecting microarray data quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Replication is essential for validating microarray experiment findings.
    • Minimizing variability is key to ensuring high-quality, reproducible microarray data.
    • Reliable microarray data is critical for successful integration with other molecular databases.