Related Experiment Videos

Amlodipine versus Angiotensin-receptor blockers for nonhypertension indications

James S Kalus1, C Michael White

  • 1Hartford Hospital/University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, USA.

Insights

Amlodipine and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) effectively lower blood pressure. ARBs offer benefits for heart failure and kidney protection, while amlodipine excels in treating angina.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Pharmacology
  • Nephrology

Background:

  • Amlodipine and Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers (ARBs) are widely used antihypertensive agents.
  • Understanding their comparative efficacy and safety is crucial for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the efficacy and safety of amlodipine and ARBs.
  • Focus on specific conditions: heart failure, angina, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and renal protection.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive MEDLINE search from 1966 to December 2001.
  • Keywords included amlodipine and various ARBs (losartan, valsartan, candesartan, telmisartan).
  • Inclusion of English-language articles representative of the review's scope.

Main Results:

  • Both amlodipine and ARBs demonstrate similar blood pressure-lowering effects.
  • Amlodipine is effective for angina; ARBs are not.
  • ARBs show efficacy in heart failure, renal protection, and preventing restenosis post-PCI.
  • ARBs are beneficial in preventing diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy.

Conclusions:

  • Treatment choice between amlodipine and ARBs should consider patient's concomitant disease states.
  • ARBs offer advantages in heart failure and renal protection compared to amlodipine.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos