Related Experiment Videos
Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy
Laura K Holden1, Margaret W Skinner, Timothy A Holden
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. holdenl@msnotes.wustl.edu
Ear and Hearing
|November 2, 2002
Summary
Cochlear implant recipients showed varied speech recognition with different electrical stimulation rates. Some performed better with 720 pulses per second per channel (pps/ch), while others benefited from 1800 pps/ch, highlighting personalized programming needs.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Cochlear implants (CIs) are vital for restoring hearing in individuals with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss.
- The Advanced Combination Encoder (ACE) speech coding strategy in Nucleus 24 devices allows for adjustable electrical stimulation rates.
- Optimizing stimulation rates is crucial for maximizing speech understanding in CI users.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare speech recognition performance in cochlear implant users at two electrical stimulation rates: 720 pulses per second per channel (pps/ch) and 1800 pps/ch.
- To investigate the relationship between psychophysical measures and program (MAP) stimulation levels for each rate.
- To assess the stability of MAP levels over a 14-week period.
Main Methods:
- Eight postlinguistically deaf adults with Nucleus 24 CIs participated.
- Speech recognition was tested using words in quiet and sentences in noise at various sound levels.
- Psychophysical measures (threshold, maximum acceptable loudness) were obtained to set and adjust MAPs for each stimulation rate.
Main Results:
- Significantly better group scores for phonemes and sentences in noise at 50 dB SPL were observed with 1800 pps/ch compared to 720 pps/ch.
- No significant differences were found for words at any level or for sentences at higher noise levels.
- Individual performance varied, with some subjects favoring 720 pps/ch and others 1800 pps/ch; subjective preferences were also mixed.
Conclusions:
- Individualized programming is essential, as over half of subjects preferred one rate over the other, and performance varied significantly.
- MAPs should incorporate both moderate (720 pps/ch) and fast (1800 pps/ch) rates within the ACE strategy during initial device use.
- Adjustments to MAP minimum and maximum levels are necessary to ensure clear and comfortable sound perception across different listening conditions.