Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence against hyperspecificity in implicit invariant learning.

Ben R Newell1, James E H Bright

  • 1Department of Psychology, University College, London, UK. b.newell@ucl.ac.uk

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|November 8, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Invariant learning shows significant cross-format transfer even without repetition structure. This challenges the idea that invariant learning is hyperspecific, suggesting it

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trapped by selective attention: The role of attentional processes in the emergence and prevention of learning traps.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Examining the Relationship Between Early Experience, Selective Attention, and the Formation of Learning Traps.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

A timeline of cognitive costs in decision-making.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same author

On-task errors drive effort avoidance more than opportunity costs.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

The impact of sampling bias on preferences for skewed distributions in decisions from experience.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Emerging adaptivity in probability learning: How young minds and the environment interact.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Learning and Memory

Background:

  • The role of repetition structure in invariant learning and cross-format transfer was previously examined by Stadler, Warren, & Lesch (2000).
  • A key claim was that cross-format transfer in invariant learning depends exclusively on repetition structures in study and test stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the necessity of repetition structure for cross-format transfer in invariant learning.
  • To challenge the notion that invariant learning is hyperspecific, meaning it is highly sensitive to minor changes in stimulus characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted, with Experiments 1-3 utilizing strings lacking any repetitions.
  • Cross-format transfer and transfer decrements (differences between same- and changed-format conditions) were measured.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 4 further explored the basis of repetition structure's role, focusing on perceptual salience.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant cross-format transfer was observed in Experiments 1-3, despite the absence of repetition structures.
    • A non-significant transfer decrement was found, indicating no substantial performance difference between same- and changed-format conditions.
    • Experiment 4 suggested that the perceptual salience of test stimuli plays a role in the effects of repetition structure.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings contrast with Stadler et al. (2000), indicating that invariant learning is not solely reliant on repetition structure.
    • Under the employed conditions, invariant learning demonstrated low sensitivity to perceptual changes in stimuli, contradicting the 'hyperspecific' description.
    • The term 'hyperspecific' should be reserved for situations with significant performance impairments due to minor format changes, such as typographical effects in implicit memory.