Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rating systems for total knee replacement.

Andrew P Davies1

  • 1Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK. andypdavies@hotmail.com

The Knee
|November 9, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Lactoferrin inhibits dexamethasone-induced chondrocyte impairment from osteoarthritic cartilage through up-regulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and suppression of FASL, FAS, and Caspase 3" [Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 441 (1) (2013) 249-255].

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2026
Same author

Adherence to unsupervised exercise in sedentary individuals: A randomised feasibility trial of two mobile health interventions.

Digital health·2023
Same author

Clinical Considerations and Practical Advice for People Living With Type 2 Diabetes Who Undertake Regular Exercise or Aim to Exercise Competitively.

Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association·2023
Same author

COVID-19 precautions: easier said than done when patients are homeless.

The Medical journal of Australia·2020
Same author

Does pre-operative anxiety and/or depression affect patient outcome after primary knee replacement arthroplasty?

The Knee·2018
Same author

Are "Patellofemoral Symptoms" Truly Related to the Patellofemoral Joint?

Knee surgery & related research·2016

This review examines surgical outcome scoring systems for total knee replacement. The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, Short Form 36, and Oxford Knee Score are recommended for reliable patient outcome assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic surgery
  • Medical assessment tools
  • Patient outcome evaluation

Background:

  • Objective assessment of surgical outcomes is increasingly important for audit and revalidation.
  • Orthopaedic surgeons require familiarity with various outcome scoring systems.
  • A lack of consensus exists among surgeons regarding the preferred scoring system for total knee replacement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and summarize available scoring systems for assessing patients undergoing total knee replacement.
  • To discuss the relative strengths and weaknesses of different outcome assessment tools.
  • To identify the most appropriate and validated scoring systems for total knee replacement outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of established and novel scoring systems for total knee replacement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Detailed description of each scoring system's methodology.
  • Comparative analysis of the reliability and validity of reviewed systems.

    • Main Results:

    • Multiple scoring systems exist for evaluating total knee replacement outcomes.
    • Newer systems generally offer advantages over older ones.
    • The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form 36 (SF-36), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) show the most robust evidence of reliability and validity.

    Conclusions:

    • No single scoring system is perfect for assessing total knee replacement outcomes.
    • WOMAC, SF-36, and OKS are recommended due to their thorough validation.
    • These validated scores are appropriate for reliable outcome assessment in total knee replacement patients.