Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Linking DNA damage to cell cycle checkpoints.

Temesgen Samuel1, H Oliver Weber, Jens Oliver Funk

  • 1Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Biology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg 91052 Erlangen, Germany.

Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)
|November 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hepatic transcriptomics reveals immuno-metabolic interactions in juvenile channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) after Aeromonas hydrophila infection.

BMC genomics·2026
Same author

Genome-Informed Identification of Species-Specific Diagnostic Markers for Listeria Using Pangenome Analysis.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Optimizing Lysis and Extraction Workflows for Enrichment-Free qPCR Detection of <i>Salmonella enterica</i> in Poultry Matrices.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Gene Expression Analysis and Whole Genome Sequencing Reveal the Potential Mechanism of Ciprofloxacin Resistance in a <i>Salmonella</i> Dublin Isolate.

Veterinary sciences·2026
Same author

Potential Use of Biosensors for the Rapid and Specific Isolation of <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> from Ready-to-Eat (RTE) Foods.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Genomic Markers Distinguishing Shiga Toxin-Producing <i>Escherichia coli</i>: Insights from Pangenome and Phylogenomic Analyses.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same journal

Circular RNA circ_0001829 attenuates G2/M arrest to promote hepatocyte proliferation by sponging miR-3095-3p following liver injury.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026
Same journal

Identification of PGF+ endothelial cells associated with plaque instability in carotid atherosclerosis by scRNA-seq and RNA-seq analysis.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026
Same journal

BMSCs-derived exosomal miR-196a-5p promotes macrophage M2 polarization and osteogenesis in postmenopausal osteoporosis through regulating Rspo2/Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026
Same journal

MicroRNA-6833-3p drives prostate cancer progression and stemness by targeting the NUMB-mediated NOTCH signaling pathway.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026
Same journal

OTUD5 promotes AML progression by stabilizing SLC7A11 to suppress ferroptosis.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026
Same journal

MITF-Driven melanoma plasticity as a core mechanism of therapy resistance: integrating microenvironmental signaling, mechanotransduction, and metabolic reprogramming.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026
See all related articles

Cell cycle checkpoints are crucial for monitoring DNA damage and replication, ensuring proper cell cycle progression. Understanding these mechanisms is key to comprehending cancer development.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Cell cycle checkpoints are essential signal transduction pathways.
  • These pathways monitor DNA integrity and replication status.
  • Dysregulation of checkpoints is implicated in various diseases, including cancer.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the functions of core components in the cell cycle response to DNA damage.
  • To provide a framework for understanding these critical cellular processes.
  • To explore the relevance of DNA damage response pathways to cancer origins.

Main Methods:

  • This study employs a theoretical framework approach.
  • It synthesizes existing knowledge on cell cycle regulation and DNA damage.
  • The focus is on the functional roles of key molecular players.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A comprehensive framework for understanding cell cycle checkpoint functions is presented.
  • The core components involved in DNA damage response are identified and their roles clarified.
  • The link between checkpoint function and cancer etiology is highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • Cell cycle checkpoints are vital for maintaining genomic stability.
  • Defects in DNA damage response pathways contribute to oncogenesis.
  • Further research into these mechanisms could reveal novel cancer therapeutic targets.