Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2026

Use of the Operant Orofacial Pain Assessment Device (OPAD) to Measure Changes in Nociceptive Behavior
Published on: June 10, 2013
The 2002 Lindberg Award. PRN vs regularly scheduled opioid analgesics in pediatric burn patients
D R Patterson1, J T Ptacek, G Carrougher
1University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Insights
Treating acute pain in young children, especially for burns, is under-researched. This study found that "as needed" opioid pain relief for pediatric burn patients was similar to regular dosing, suggesting a need for standardized pain management protocols.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pain Management
- Burn Injury Treatment
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Limited research exists on managing acute pain in children under three years old, particularly for burn injuries.
- Effective pain assessment and treatment strategies for nonverbal pediatric patients remain a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively examine pain behavior and opioid analgesic use in pediatric burn patients younger than three years.
- To compare pain management outcomes between 'as needed' and regularly scheduled opioid analgesic administration in this population.
Main Methods:
- Prospective monitoring of pain behavior and opioid analgesic intake in 31 pediatric burn patients.
- Randomized comparison of 'as needed' (pro re nata) versus regularly scheduled opioid analgesics in 12 patients.
- Observation of pain and medication practices in non-randomized subjects.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in demonstrable pain were observed between the 'as needed' and regularly scheduled opioid groups.
- Both groups received equivalent doses of opioid analgesics, indicating 'as needed' dosing was likely administered on a regular schedule.
- Regularly scheduled opioid analgesics were common practice for most non-randomized subjects.
Conclusions:
- Current practices suggest a trend towards institutionalized regular opioid administration for pediatric burn patients.
- Findings offer insights into pediatric opioid dosing and pain measurement for nonverbal subjects.
- Further research is needed to optimize acute pain management strategies for young children with burns.
Abstract:
Very little has been published on treating acute pain in children younger than the age of 3 for burns or any other trauma etiology. This study prospectively monitored the pain behavior and opioid analgesic intake of 31 pediatric burn patients (mean age = 23.71 months; SD = 15.75). Twelve of those children were randomized to conditions in which they either received opioid analgesics pro re nata (ie, as needed, pain contingent) or on a regular basis. The two groups did not show differences in demonstrable pain but, interestingly, they received equivalent does of opioid analgesics. As such, the pro re nata group was likely medicated largely on a regularly scheduled basis. For most of the remaining (nonrandomized) subjects, physicians ordered regularly scheduled opioid analgesics, suggesting that this practice has become largely institutionalized in the study setting. Information on pediatric opioid analgesic dosing and pain measurement strategies for nonverbal subjects can be derived from the findings.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Analgesia and Pain Management
Opioid Analgesics: Morphine and Other Natural Cogeners
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids

