Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Can computerized cost data substitute for chart review?
Daniel Shine1, Punidha Sundaram, Deborra M Torres
1Department of Medicine, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USA. dshine@sbhcs.com
Insights
Using patient billing data can efficiently identify congestive heart failure (CHF) care compliance, matching manual chart review accuracy for quality improvement initiatives.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Quality Improvement
- Clinical Data Analysis
Background:
- Manual chart review is time-consuming for quality improvement.
- Exploring automated methods can enhance healthcare efficiency.
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) care requires robust quality monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess if patient-level cost data can identify compliance with CHF quality indicators.
- To compare the efficiency of database analysis versus manual chart review.
Main Methods:
- Selected charges from a patient-level cost database were analyzed.
- Data from 75 randomly chosen CHF patients were examined.
- Compliance with a principal peer review organization criterion was determined.
Main Results:
- Database analysis indicated 65% compliance with the CHF criterion.
- Manual chart review showed 69% compliance.
- The difference between methods was comparable to inter-reviewer variability.
Conclusions:
- Patient billing data can serve as a viable alternative to manual chart review for CHF quality monitoring.
- This approach may improve efficiency in healthcare quality improvement efforts.
- Further validation in diverse settings is warranted.
Abstract:
Identification of alternatives to manual chart review might improve efficiency in quality improvement work. This study at a large community teaching hospital in central New Jersey considered whether selected charges from a patient-level costs database could identify compliance with Sixth Scope of Work indicators in congestive heart failure (CHF). Charges resulting from specific tests, from test outcomes, and from prescribed treatments were identified from among 75 randomly chosen patients with CHF. In the sample 65% (as determined by database analysis) and 69% (as determined by chart review) complied with the principal peer review organization criterion. This difference was less than that found between review and re-review of study charts.
More Related Videos
04:58Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Interpreting Run Charts