Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Concurrent motion detection based on dynamic changes in interaural delay.

Kourosh Saberi1, Prisilia Tirtabudi, Agavni Petrosyan

  • 1Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. kourosh@uci.edu

Hearing Research
|November 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Audiovisual Synchrony in Left-hemisphere Brain-lesioned Individuals with Aphasia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Informational Masking in Aging and Brain-lesioned Individuals.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2022
Same author

Forward entrainment: Psychophysics, neural correlates, and function.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same author

Detection of dynamic changes in interaural delay by older adults (L).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022
Same author

Confirming an antiphasic bicyclic pattern of forward entrainment in signal detection: A reanalysis of Sun et al. (2021).

The European journal of neuroscience·2022
Same author

A critical analysis of Lin et al.'s (2021) failure to observe forward entrainment in pitch discrimination.

The European journal of neuroscience·2022

Auditory motion detection, specifically changes in interaural delay, is impaired by distracter tones. Performance decreased with concurrent distracter motion, even at different frequencies.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Auditory scene analysis

Background:

  • Interaural delay (ID) is a crucial cue for sound localization.
  • Detecting dynamic changes in ID is essential for perceiving auditory motion.
  • The presence of competing sounds can significantly impact auditory perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the detection of dynamic interaural delay changes in a target tone.
  • To examine the influence of a distracter tone (stationary or moving) on this detection.
  • To assess the effect of frequency separation between target and distracter tones.

Main Methods:

  • A two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) design was used to measure detection performance (d').
  • Participants detected dynamic versus static interaural delay in a 500-Hz target tone.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Distracter tones varied in frequency, interaural delay (stationary, same-direction motion, opposite-direction motion), duration, and rate of change.

    • Main Results:

    • Detection performance was highest in the absence of a distracter.
    • Performance decreased sequentially with stationary distracters, opposite-direction distracters, and same-direction distracters.
    • Detection improved with greater frequency differences between target and distracter, but remained suboptimal.

    Conclusions:

    • Concurrent auditory motion, especially in the same direction, significantly impairs the detection of dynamic interaural delay changes.
    • Frequency separation offers some masking release but does not fully restore performance.
    • These findings highlight the challenges in auditory scene analysis when multiple dynamic auditory objects are present.