Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spine loading as a function of gender.

William S Marras1, Kermit G Davis, Michael Jorgensen

  • 1Biodynamics Laboratory, Institute for Ergonomics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. marras.1@osu.edu

Spine
|November 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex- and Age-Related Variation in Vertebral Geometry Influences Lumbar Spine Loading: An Image-Based Computational Modeling Study.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Impact of vertebrae shape variation on lumbar spine loading: an image-based computational modeling study.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2026
Same author

Biomechanical models of lumbar spine degeneration: Methods, challenges, and clinical promise.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2025
Same author

A Computational Multiscale Framework for Bone Remodeling: Coupling Apparent Density Evolution and Microscale Shape Optimization.

International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

Effects of Bed Height on Balance during Ingress and Egress from a Hospital Bed.

International journal of nursing and health care research·2025
Same author

Evaluating the impact of shift work length and time of day on musculoskeletal disorders among nursing assistants in long-term care.

Human factors in healthcare·2025
Same journal

Comparing those Most Satisfied versus Least Satisfied Following Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Are there Differences in Baseline Characteristics?

Spine·2026
Same journal

Pseudoarthrosis After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Multicenter Analysis of Revision Strategies and Outcomes.

Spine·2026
Same journal

To the Editor "Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Statin Usage Are Associated With Rates of Pseudarthrosis Following Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion" by Lavu et al.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Sarcopenia Increases Adjacent Segment Degeneration Risk within 3 Years of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Two-Year Cervical Alignment Trajectories and Associated Radiographic Factors after Posterior Spinal Fusion for Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Association of C7 Laminoplasty and Decompression Construct Length With Postoperative Axial Symptoms After Cervical Expansive Unilateral Open-door Laminoplasty.

Spine·2026
See all related articles

Men and women experience different spine loads during lifting tasks. While body mass influences loads in controlled lifts, women face greater relative spine loading and risk of injury in dynamic, whole-body lifts due to muscle coactivation.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Occupational Health
  • Ergonomics

Background:

  • Limited research exists on gender-based differences in spine loading during occupational lifting tasks.
  • Anthropometric variations between genders may influence muscle recruitment and resultant spine loads.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial as workplaces often assign similar tasks regardless of gender, impacting low back disorder risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and delineate disparities in spine loading and musculoskeletal control strategies between males and females during lifting.
  • To analyze how varying task complexity influences these gender-specific biomechanical responses.

Main Methods:

  • In vivo laboratory studies involving 140 participants (70 men, 70 women).
  • Two experimental conditions: isolated torso lifting and free-dynamic whole-body lifting.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized an electromyography-assisted model to quantify spine loading.

    • Main Results:

    • Men generally exhibited greater absolute spine compression.
    • In controlled lifts, differences were mainly attributed to body mass.
    • In dynamic lifts, women showed greater relative compression and anterior-posterior shear spine loading due to altered muscle coactivation patterns.

    Conclusions:

    • Gender-based spine loading differences in controlled lifts are largely due to body mass.
    • Dynamic lifting reveals distinct gender-specific loading patterns driven by kinematic compensations and muscle cocontraction, with women experiencing higher relative loads.
    • Considering spine tolerance, females may face a heightened risk of musculoskeletal overload during lifting activities.