Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spinal loads during individual and team lifting.

G J Dennis1, R S Barrett

  • 1Biomechanics Dynamics Group, School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, PMB 50 Gold Coast Mail Centre 9726, Queensland, Australia. g.dennis@mailbox.gu.edu.au

Ergonomics
|November 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Hendra virus vaccine: perceptions regarding the role of antibody titre testing.

Australian veterinary journal·2021
Same author

Machine learning methods to support personalized neuromusculoskeletal modelling.

Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology·2020
Same author

Individuals with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis walk with lower hip joint contact forces despite higher levels of muscle co-contraction compared to healthy individuals.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2020
Same author

The influence of speed and size on avian terrestrial locomotor biomechanics: Predicting locomotion in extinct theropod dinosaurs.

PloS one·2018
Same author

Using step width to compare locomotor biomechanics between extinct, non-avian theropod dinosaurs and modern obligate bipeds.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2017
Same author

Regional three-dimensional deformation of human Achilles tendon during conditioning.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2016
Same journal

Fit and dimensional allowance design of firefighting gloves via 3D scanning technology.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Team lifting significantly reduces lumbar spinal loads by approximately 20% compared to individual lifting. This is due to increased pulling force and a closer hand position to the spine during team lifting tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Occupational Health
  • Ergonomics

Background:

  • Manual handling tasks, such as lifting, are a common cause of low back pain in the workplace.
  • Understanding the biomechanical factors influencing spinal loads during lifting is crucial for injury prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare lumbar spinal loads between individual and two-person team lifting tasks.
  • To identify the biomechanical factors contributing to differences in spinal loads during these tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Ten healthy males performed individual and team lifts with varying box masses.
  • Hand forces were measured using instrumented boxes, and kinematics were captured via motion measurement.
  • L4/L5 dynamic torques were calculated to estimate compression and shear forces using a biomechanical model.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Team lifting resulted in a significant reduction of approximately 20% in L4/L5 torque and compression force compared to individual lifting.
  • Key factors contributing to reduced spinal loads in team lifting included greater horizontal hand force (pulling) and a closer hand position to the lumbar spine.
  • Both horizontal hand force and hand position contributed equally to the observed spinal load reduction.

Conclusions:

  • Team lifting strategies can effectively reduce biomechanical stress on the lumbar spine.
  • Implementing team lifting may be a viable approach to mitigate the risk of low back injuries associated with manual handling.