Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Aortic complications after bicuspid aortic valve replacement: long-term results
Claudio F Russo1, Simone Mazzetti, Andrea Garatti
1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy. f.russo@tiscali.it
Insights
Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) face higher risks of aortic dissection and death after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Prophylactic ascending aorta replacement is recommended for BAV patients undergoing AVR.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a known risk factor for aortic dissection and aneurysm.
- Long-term aortic changes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in BAV patients require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate long-term changes in the ascending aorta among patients with BAV compared to tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients after AVR.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 100 patients undergoing AVR was divided into two groups: BAV (n=50) and TAV (n=50).
- Patients were monitored for long-term outcomes, including aortic dissection, sudden death, and ascending aorta diameter via echocardiogram.
- Exclusion criteria included hypertension and Marfan's syndrome.
Main Results:
- Patients with BAV experienced significantly higher rates of late acute aortic dissection (10% vs 0%) and sudden death (p=0.0001).
- The mean ascending aorta diameter was significantly larger in the BAV group (48.4 mm) compared to the TAV group (36.8 mm).
- Three BAV patients required surgery for ascending aorta aneurysm (>6 cm).
Conclusions:
- Prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta, even if normal or mildly enlarged, is recommended during AVR in patients with BAV.
- A similar prophylactic approach should be considered for other cardiac surgical procedures in BAV patients.
Background:
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a risk factor for aortic dissection and aneurysm. We studied patients with BAV and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) to evaluate long-term changes in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement (AVR).
Patients And Methods:
One hundred consecutive patients were allocated into two groups according to the presence of BAV (group A, 50 patients) or TAV (group B, 50 patients). Mean age was 51 +/- 12 years in group A, and 50 +/- years 12 in group B. No patients had hypertension or Marfan's syndrome. Until July 2001, mean follow-up was 234 +/- 47 months in group A and 241 +/- 43 months in group B.
Results:
Five patients (10%, CL 5.7 to 13.9) in group A suffered late acute aortic dissection. Acute aortic dissection (5 vs 0, p = 0.0001) and sudden death (7 vs 0, p = 0.0001) occurred more frequently in patients with BAV. All survivors were assessed by echocardiogram. The mean diameter of the ascending aorta was 48.4 mm in group A and 36.8 mm in group B. Three patients in group A were operated on because of ascending aorta aneurysm more than 6 cm in diameter.
Conclusions:
As a result of our experience, we recommend a policy of prophylactic replacement of even a seemingly normal and definitely a mildly enlarged ascending aorta in cases of BAV at the moment of AVR, and consideration of a similar approach for any other cardiac surgical procedure in patients with BAV.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
