Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for evaluating research articles.

Phillip Rumrill1, Shawn Fitzgerald, Megen Ware

  • 1Kent State University, Department of Educational Foundations and Special Services Center for Disability Studies, 405 White Hall, P.O. Box 5190, Kent, OH 44242-0001, USA.

Work (Reading, Mass.)
|November 21, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A "win-win" approach to workplace accommodations for autistic workers.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2025
Same author

The role of healthcare providers in return to work and stay at work services for people with mid-career disabilities: A holistic statewide model.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Psychometric validation of the adapted inventory of virtues and strengths for cancer survivors: Implications for psychosocial and vocational rehabilitation.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Supported employment as a mental health and employment intervention for people recovering from addiction: A propensity score-matched retrospective case control study.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Investigating the challenges of air travel in the United States: a qualitative study of the lived experiences of wheelchair users with spinal cord injury or disorder.

Spinal cord series and cases·2024
Same author

Subjective well-being of adults with multiple sclerosis during COVID-19: Evaluating stress-appraisal-coping and person-environment factors.

Rehabilitation psychology·2023
Same journal

Factors associated with self-reported musculoskeletal symptoms among preschool teachers in Turkey.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Intraoperative OR-Stretch Microbreaks: A pre-implementation study on two break scheduling strategies.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

The relationship between hospital violence and self-efficacy expectation among healthcare professionals during major public health events: The role of mental health and caring patients.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Emotional intelligence as A predictor of caring behaviors in icu nurses: Implications for nursing management in resource-limited settings.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Towards employee-centric HR: Understanding the link between opportunity-enhancing HR practices and employee taking charge at work.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain, performance anxiety, and stress-producing life events among orchestral players in Brazil: An observational study.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

This article outlines the structure of rehabilitation research papers, covering essential components from title to references. It also provides a critical analysis scale for evaluating scientific merit in rehabilitation research.

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation research
  • Scientific writing
  • Manuscript structure

Background:

  • Empirical research in rehabilitation requires clear reporting standards.
  • Effective communication of findings is crucial for advancing the field.
  • Understanding manuscript components aids critical appraisal.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the essential components of rehabilitation research articles.
  • To provide technical writing strategies for empirical research reporting.
  • To introduce a critical analysis scale for rehabilitation research manuscripts.

Main Methods:

  • Descriptive analysis of standard research manuscript sections (Title, Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, References).
  • Delineation of technical writing strategies for scientific reporting.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a critical analysis scale for evaluating research quality.

    • Main Results:

    • Identification of key components and their typical content in rehabilitation research articles.
    • Explanation of effective writing techniques for each section.
    • Presentation of a novel scale for assessing the scientific merit of published work.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized reporting enhances the clarity and impact of rehabilitation research.
    • The proposed scale offers a practical tool for evaluating research quality.
    • Improved manuscript analysis benefits practitioners, reviewers, educators, and students.