Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimizing stress in the workplace: Whose responsibility is it?

Martha A. Sanders1

  • 1Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Quinnipiac University, 275 Mt. Carmel Road, Hamden, CT~06518, USA. Tel.: +1 203 582 8416; Fax: +1 203 582 8706; E-mail: Martha.Sanders@quinnipiac.edu. Prevention Works, 36 Cherry Lane, Madison, CT 06443, USA

Work (Reading, Mass.)
|November 21, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From the Guest Editor.

Work (Reading, Mass.)ยท2002
See all related articles

Work-related stress significantly impacts employee well-being and organizational success. This article examines barriers to workplace stress reduction programs and highlights supportive global legislation.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Public Policy
  • Organizational Psychology

Background:

  • Work-related stress is a widespread issue affecting employee health, productivity, and commitment.
  • Existing stress prevention strategies require reevaluation to address systemic impacts.
  • Legislators and researchers are increasingly focused on effective stress management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Identify key challenges hindering the implementation of primary workplace stress reduction programs.
  • Analyze emerging global legislative actions aimed at mitigating occupational stress.
  • Provide insights into the development of more effective stress prevention strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current stress reduction programs.
  • Analysis of global legislative trends and initiatives.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of systemic barriers to program development.

    • Main Results:

    • Several critical issues impede the creation and effectiveness of primary stress reduction programs.
    • Growing legislative momentum globally supports workplace stress mitigation.
    • A gap exists between the need for stress reduction and current program implementation.

    Conclusions:

    • Addressing the identified barriers is crucial for developing effective workplace stress reduction programs.
    • Global legislative support offers a pathway for improved occupational health strategies.
    • Further research and policy development are needed to enhance stress prevention in the workplace.