Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality assurance in screening strategies.

Anthony B Miller1

  • 1Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer feld 280, Abteilung C0500 Postfach 101949, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. a.miller@dkfz-heidelberg.de

Virus Research
|November 26, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Successful cervical cancer screening requires high coverage, adequate testing, treatment facilities, and patient acceptance. Failures in developing countries often stem from poor quality management across all program components, not the screening test itself.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and risk of pancreatic cancer: an analysis of 2.3 million participants in the Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer (DCPP).

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2023
Same author

Associations of life course obesity with endometrial cancer in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2).

International journal of epidemiology·2023
Same author

The OncoSim-Breast Cancer Microsimulation Model.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2022
Same author

The Critical Importance of Molecular Biomarkers and Imaging in the Study of Electrohypersensitivity. A Scientific Consensus International Report.

International journal of molecular sciences·2021
Same author

Estimating the future cancer management costs attributable to modifiable risk factors in Canada.

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2021

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening programs are highly effective in developed nations but show limited success in developing countries.
  • Failures in developing countries are frequently linked to inadequate quality across various program components.
  • Even with excellent laboratory facilities, overall program impact can be hindered by systemic issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the essential components for successful cancer screening programs.
  • To analyze the reasons for the ineffectiveness of cervical cancer screening in developing countries.
  • To emphasize the importance of quality assurance in all levels of screening program management.

Main Methods:

  • Review of prerequisites for effective screening programs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of common failure points in cervical cancer screening, particularly in developing countries.
  • Identification of critical stages requiring quality assurance, from target population definition to long-term follow-up.

    • Main Results:

    • Successful screening necessitates understanding, acceptance, high coverage, testing, treatment, and follow-up.
    • Program failures in developing countries are attributed to quality deficits in management and organization, not solely the screening test.
    • Quality assurance is crucial at every stage: recruitment, testing, results communication, investigation, treatment, and re-screening.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective cervical cancer screening hinges on robust management and organization with quality assurance at all levels.
    • Addressing systemic failures in program components is vital for improving screening effectiveness in resource-limited settings.
    • Focusing on improving the overall program infrastructure and quality is more critical than evaluating alternative screening tests.