Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Athletic activity after total joint replacement.

Mathew A Nicholls1, Jeffrey B Selby, James M Hartford

  • 1Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, USA.

Orthopedics
|November 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of Smoking Status on Early Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

No Difference in Early Range of Motion Between CORI Robotic-TKA and Conventional-TKA: A Single-Surgeon Series.

Arthroplasty today·2025
Same author

Reduced Incidence of Perioperative Periprosthetic Fractures Using Hybrid Rasp-Impaction Broaching Over Impaction Broaching When Using the Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty today·2022
Same author

Clinical Outcomes Following Distal Femur Replacement for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2022
Same author

Perioperative Complications Stratified by Body Mass Index for the Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2020
Same author

Isolated Greater Trochanteric Fracture and the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Fracture Table.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2018
Same journal

Preoperative Copper-to-Zinc Ratio and Postoperative Delirium After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Supracondylar Distal Femur Fracture Fixation: Early Experiences Comparing the Retrograde Nail With Locking Attachment Washer (LAW) Plate to Traditional Fixation Techniques.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Intra-Articular Vancomycin Powder in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Limb Salvage Versus Amputation for the Management of Primary Bone Tumors of the Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

A Modified Keshishyan Index Demonstrates Three-dimensional Assessment of Asymmetry in Pediatric Pelvic Fractures.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Planned Versus Intraoperative Vascular Surgery Consultations in Orthopedic Oncology.

Orthopedics·2026
See all related articles

Total hip and knee replacement surgery effectively relieves pain and restores function. However, younger, active patients should limit athletic activities to low-impact options due to current implant limitations.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Sports Medicine

Background:

  • Total hip and knee arthroplasty are established treatments for arthritis, offering pain relief and functional improvement.
  • A growing demographic of younger, active individuals are undergoing these procedures, presenting unique challenges.
  • Patient expectations and activity demands are increasing in this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the role of current total hip and knee replacement (THKR) technologies in athletic participation.
  • To define appropriate activity guidelines for patients with THKR.
  • To explore the potential impact of future advancements on activity levels.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current surgical techniques and implant designs for total hip and knee replacement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the impact of activity type, intensity, and duration on THKR outcomes.
  • Consideration of biomechanical principles related to joint loading and implant wear.

    • Main Results:

    • Current THKR techniques and implants provide significant benefits but necessitate limitations on athletic activities.
    • Recommended activities for patients with THKR include low-impact, low-demand, and short-duration exercises.
    • High-impact or high-demand activities may compromise implant longevity and patient outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • While THKR offers substantial improvements, patient activity must be carefully managed to ensure long-term success.
    • Future innovations in bearing surfaces hold promise for enabling higher-demand activities in THKR recipients.
    • A balanced approach considering patient expectations and implant capabilities is crucial for optimizing outcomes.