Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Set- and Element-Level Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effects for Different Manual Response Sets.

R W Proctor1, H Wang2

  • 1a Purdue University.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|November 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Duck hepatitis B virus integrations in LMH chicken hepatoma cells: identification and characterization of new episomally derived integrations.

Journal of virology·1995
Same author

Automated assay of oxygen radical absorbance capacity with the COBAS FARA II.

Clinical chemistry·1995
Same author

The Claviceps purpurea gene encoding dimethylallyltryptophan synthase, the committed step for ergot alkaloid biosynthesis.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·1995
Same author

Direct effects of smooth muscle relaxation and contraction on in vivo human brachial artery elastic properties.

Circulation research·1995
Same author

Yeast two-hybrid system demonstrates that estrogen receptor dimerization is ligand-dependent in vivo.

The Journal of biological chemistry·1995
Same author

Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of novel Fe(III), Co(II), and Zn(II) complexes with norfloxacin.

Journal of inorganic biochemistry·1995

This study on stimulus-response compatibility found that using one or two effectors primarily determined set-level compatibility. Element-level compatibility differences were mainly due to screen versus keyboard responses.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Previous research indicated higher set-level compatibility when spatial stimuli mapped to bimanual responses and verbal stimuli to unimanual movements.
  • Element-level compatibility effects were also larger under high set-level compatibility conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To isolate and evaluate the determinants of stimulus-response compatibility differences.
  • To further understand the factors influencing set-level and element-level compatibility.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted with a total of 120 student participants.
  • The study systematically varied stimulus types (spatial, verbal) and response modalities (unimanual, bimanual) across keyboard and screen interfaces.
Keywords:
perceptual-motor interactionsresponse selectionstimulus-response compatibility

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The primary determinant of set-level compatibility variation was the number of effectors used (one vs. two).
  • Differences in element-level compatibility effects were primarily driven by the response interface (screen vs. keyboard).

Conclusions:

  • The findings clarify the distinct contributions of effector count and response modality to stimulus-response compatibility.
  • Results have implications for refining models of stimulus-response compatibility, particularly in interface design.