Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Reduction in vascular access site bleeding in sequential abciximab coronary intervention trials
James C Blankenship1, Craig Balog, Shelly K Sapp
1Department of Cardiology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822, USA. jblankenship@geisinger.edu
Insights
Vascular access site bleeding complications significantly decreased across three trials, particularly with abciximab. Improved management strategies and dosing have largely eliminated excess bleeding risks during coronary interventions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Vascular access site bleeding is a significant complication in percutaneous coronary interventions.
- Abciximab, an antiplatelet agent, has been associated with increased bleeding risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the reduction in vascular access site bleeding complications across the EPIC, EPILOG, and EPISTENT trials.
- To assess the impact of abciximab on bleeding complications over time and with evolving management strategies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of pooled data from three large-scale clinical trials: EPIC, EPILOG, and EPISTENT.
- Comparison of vascular access site bleeding rates (major and minor) between patients receiving abciximab and those receiving placebo (or heparin alone).
- Statistical analysis to determine the significance of observed bleeding rate changes and the effect of abciximab.
Main Results:
- A progressive and significant decrease in combined major and minor vascular access site bleeding was observed in both non-abciximab and abciximab groups across the trials (P < 0.001).
- While abciximab was associated with more major bleeds in the EPIC trial (OR 3.2), this difference was not significant in EPILOG or EPISTENT.
- The incidence of bleeding complications in abciximab patients decreased substantially from EPIC (20%) to EPILOG (5.8%) and EPISTENT (2.2%).
Conclusions:
- Modified dosing strategies for abciximab and heparin, coupled with enhanced vascular access site management, have significantly reduced bleeding risks.
- The excess vascular access site bleeding historically associated with abciximab has been effectively mitigated through these advancements.
- These findings support the continued use of abciximab in conjunction with optimized protocols for coronary interventions.
Abstract:
We analyzed vascular access site bleeding from the EPIC, EPILOG, and EPISTENT trials to quantify the decrease in vascular bleeding complications in these three trials, especially those attributable to abciximab. The incidence of combined major and minor vascular access site bleeding in nonabciximab (heparin plus placebo) patients progressively decreased from EPIC (8.2%) to EPILOG (2.9%) to EPISTENT (1.7%; P < 0.001). Combined major and minor vascular access site bleeding in abciximab (heparin plus abciximab) patients decreased from EPIC (20%) to EPILOG (5.8%) to EPISTENT (2.2%; P < 0.001). There were more major vascular access site bleeds with abciximab compared to placebo in EPIC (odds ration 3.2; P < 0.001) but not in EPILOG or EPISTENT. Modified abciximab and heparin dosing and improved vascular access site management strategies have decreased the risk of vascular access bleeding during coronary intervention and have essentially eliminated the excess access site bleeding associated with abciximab.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care