Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens.

Sibylla Richter-Mueksch1, Herbert Weghaupt, Christian Skorpik

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|November 30, 2002
PubMed
Summary

The diffractive bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) demonstrated superior reading performance compared to multifocal and monofocal IOLs. This study evaluated reading acuity, speed, and distance across different IOL types.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The design of Malay sentences for measuring reading performance for the Radner-UKM Malay Reading Charts.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Femtosecond-Laser-Assisted Liquid-Interface vs Vacuum-Trephine Keratoplasty: A Comparison of 2 Different Techniques - Retrospective Data Analysis.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025
Same author

A historical view of the development of corneal transplantation: from penetrating keratoplasty to selective transplantation of the finest corneal layers.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2025
Same author

Letter to the editor: ISO 7921:2024-A new international standard for measurement of reading acuity.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2025
Same author

Aetiology, Diagnosis and Treatment of Arterial Occlusions of the Retina-A Narrative Review.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2024
Same author

Toward an internationally accepted standard for reading charts.

Progress in retinal and eye research·2024

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Intraocular lenses (IOLs) are crucial for vision restoration after cataract surgery.
  • Evaluating the reading performance of different IOL designs is essential for patient visual function.
  • This study compares diffractive bifocal, refractive multifocal, and monofocal IOLs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess and compare the reading performance of a diffractive bifocal IOL (811E), a refractive multifocal IOL (SA40N), and a monofocal IOL (811C).
  • Key performance metrics include reading acuity, reading speed, maximum reading speed, reading distance, and critical print size.

Main Methods:

  • The study included 120 pseudophakic eyes from 70 patients, with 40 eyes per IOL group.
  • Reading acuity (logRAD) and speed were measured monocularly.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Bifocal and multifocal IOL groups used best distance correction; the monofocal group used +3.0 diopters addition.

    • Main Results:

    • Reading acuity was significantly poorer in the multifocal (SA40N) group compared to bifocal (811E) and monofocal (811C) groups.
    • Reading speed and critical print size were significantly worse in the SA40N group than in the 811E and 811C groups.
    • The diffractive bifocal (811E) IOL showed the best reading performance among the tested IOLs in a standardized setting.

    Conclusions:

    • Reading performance was acceptable for both bifocal and multifocal IOLs.
    • The diffractive bifocal IOL (811E) exhibited the best reading performance in this study.
    • These findings aid in selecting IOLs for optimal reading function in pseudophakic patients.