Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods of correcting Anger camera deadtime losses.

J A Sorenson

    Journal of Nuclear Medicine : Official Publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
    |February 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Problems in estimating hemodynamic response parameters from fMRI data.

    Human brain mapping·2010
    Same author

    Tamoxifen retinopathy in a male patient.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2001
    Same author

    Endoscopic vitreoretinal surgery for complicated proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

    Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2001
    Same author

    Compensation of susceptibility-induced signal loss in echo-planar imaging for functional applications.

    Magnetic resonance imaging·2000
    Same author

    Retinal choroidal anastomoses and occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration.

    Ophthalmology·2000
    Same author

    Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy masquerading as central serous chorioretinopathy.

    Ophthalmology·2000

    Accurate Anger camera deadtime correction is crucial for nuclear medicine. A new pileup-counting method proved more reliable than analytic or marker-source methods for accurate gamma camera quantitation.

    Area of Science:

    • Nuclear Medicine
    • Medical Imaging
    • Radiologic Technology

    Background:

    • Anger cameras are essential for nuclear medicine imaging.
    • Deadtime loss significantly impacts quantitation accuracy.
    • Accurate deadtime correction is vital for reliable diagnostic information.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate and compare three methods for correcting Anger camera deadtime loss.
    • To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of analytic, marker-source, and pileup-counting methods.
    • To identify the most effective method for accurate gamma camera quantitation.

    Main Methods:

    • Investigated analytic (mathematical modeling) deadtime correction.
    • Evaluated the marker-source method for deadtime correction.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Developed and tested a novel pileup-counting method using a pulse-height analyzer window.

    • Main Results:

    • Analytic methods were unreliable due to scattering variations.
    • Marker-source and pileup-counting methods achieved accuracy within a few percent up to 200 K cps.
    • The pileup-counting method demonstrated superior performance compared to the marker-source method.

    Conclusions:

    • The pileup-counting method offers a more accurate and reliable approach to Anger camera deadtime correction.
    • This method is effective for various source depths and high counting rates.
    • Accurate deadtime correction enhances the diagnostic value of nuclear medicine imaging.