Validation of a new diagnostic procedure for DSM IV axis I disorders

Despite the fact that, in today's psychiatric research and especially in epidemiological studies, diagnostic assessments are made with reliable standardized clinical interviews, recent articles have shown discrepancies in prevalence rates of DSM IV axis I disorders assessed with different, yet reliable, clinical standardized interviews, raising the problem of the clinical relevance of some of these instruments. Within an epidemiological study, we developed a simple method for evaluating DSM IV axis I disorders with the aim of improving the clinical relevance of assessed diagnoses. This method is based on an evaluation performed by two clinicians. The first one used a short structured clinical interview (MINI v 5.0) and the second one completed the procedure with an open clinical interview, intended to be more clinically relevant. Finally, a consensus diagnosis is given by the two investigators. We conducted a survey in order to validate this method by measuring the agreement of diagnoses reported by two pairs of clinicians on a population of 20 inpatients. Results show that this double evaluation led to a high agreement (kappa ranging between 0.76 and 1.00) suggesting that the proposed evaluation procedure, which is intended to be more clinically relevant, is also highly reliable.