Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Temporal integration: intentional sound discrimination does not modulate stimulus-driven processes in auditory event

Elyse Sussman1, István Winkler, Judith Kreuzer

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. esussman@aecom.yu.edu

Clinical Neurophysiology : Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
|December 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How the brain predicts timing: distinct network hubs for predicting and evaluating auditory sensory events.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

Evidence for temporal-coherence-based segregation of complex auditory scenes in the newborn human brain.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Mental imagery modulates bistable perception in a modality-specific manner.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Interpersonal coordination in communication: effects of alignment in multiple modalities on objective and subjective task outcomes.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Human newborns form musical predictions based on rhythmic but not melodic structure.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Predictive Processing Over the Course of Aging: Multiple Timescales of Effective Connectivity.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Auditory context initially shapes sound perception, but conscious awareness doesn't alter early event formation. Top-down processing extracts details later, after initial auditory event encoding.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Auditory context influences the pre-attentive encoding of successive acoustic changes within the temporal integration window.
  • Previous research suggests context determines if sounds are perceived as one event or two discrete events.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether top-down (cognitive) processes can override or influence stimulus-driven (bottom-up) processes in auditory event formation.
  • To determine if conscious perception of auditory events aligns with early neural processing.

Main Methods:

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) recorded neural activity in response to standard and deviant sounds.
  • Mismatch negativity (MMN) and N2b event-related potentials (ERPs) were analyzed.
  • Performance in discriminating successive auditory feature changes was compared with ERPs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • While subjects could consciously discriminate successive auditory changes (indicated by N2b), this did not alter the initial neural representation of the sounds as a single event (indexed by MMN).
  • Top-down processing did not modify the stimulus-driven organization of auditory events reflected by the MMN.

Conclusions:

  • Early auditory event formation is primarily governed by auditory context and stimulus-driven processes.
  • Top-down processes can extract detailed auditory information but operate at a later stage than the initial event encoding indexed by MMN.
  • Conscious perception does not necessarily alter the initial, context-dependent neural representation of auditory events.