Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.

Roberta L Klatzky1, Yvonne Lippa, Jack M Loomis

  • 1Department of Psychology, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. klatzky@cmu.edu

Learning & Memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)
|December 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autonomous multisensory enhancement of a visual neuroprosthesis for navigation: technical proof-of-concept with simulated prosthetic vision and single-subject case study of a visual prosthesis user.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Goal uncertainty attenuates sensorimotor adaptation.

Journal of neurophysiology·2025
Same author

Toward human-resolution haptics: A high-bandwidth, high-density, wearable tactile display.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Emergent patterns of interaction with dynamic objects.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Comparison of Patient Reported Sensory Hypersensitivity in Mohs and Interventional Pain Patients.

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]·2024
Same author

Haptic Perception and Its Relation to Action.

Annual review of psychology·2024

Learning object locations is faster using visual or 3D sound cues compared to spatial language. This difference persists even when controlling for other sensory inputs, suggesting language processing adds complexity to spatial learning.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • The way spatial information is presented influences how effectively individuals learn object locations.
  • Previous research suggests differences in learning based on sensory modality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different presentation modalities (visual, auditory, language) affect the learning of multiple object azimuths.
  • To determine if the learning disadvantage for spatial language is due to indirect processing.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Participants learned object azimuths using a virtual visual environment, spatial audition (3D sound), or auditory spatial language.
  • Experiment 2: Modalities were equated for proprioceptive cues, and unique visual (optic flow) and auditory (binaural signals) cues were removed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Learning five object azimuths was faster with spatial modalities (vision, audition) than with spatial language in Experiment 1.
  • A learning disadvantage for spatial language was observed in Experiment 2, even after controlling for sensory cues.

Conclusions:

  • The modality of spatial information significantly impacts learning efficiency.
  • Spatial language presents a unique processing cost compared to direct spatial perception, hindering the learning of multiple locations.