Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Valid informed consent: a process, not a signature.

Dan C English1

  • 1Center for Clinical Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

The American Surgeon
|December 7, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Addressing a patient's refusal of care based on religious beliefs.

American family physician·2007
Same author

Moral obligations of patients: a clinical view.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2005
Same journal

Complete Response of Merkel Cell Carcinoma to Immunotherapy and Single-Fraction Radiotherapy Following Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report and Review of Immune Mechanism.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction in Non-Cardiac Operations: A National Analysis.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of Completion Cholecystectomy: Association With Patient Comorbidity in a National Database.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Building the Conversation: Editorial Stewardship in Contemporary Surgical Publishing.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal Pain in Surgeons on Operating Days.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Splenectomy During Cytoreductive Surgery: Marker of Surgical Burden or Independent Predictor of Morbidity?

The American surgeon·2026
See all related articles

Informed consent in surgery requires more than a signature; it demands clear communication about risks, alternatives, and patient understanding. This ensures valid patient agreement and better outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Surgical Practice
  • Patient Communication

Background:

  • Historically, surgeons relied on signed consent forms.
  • Recent understanding highlights the difference between a signature and true informed consent.
  • Ensuring patient comprehension and voluntariness is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the essential components of valid informed consent.
  • To propose methods for ensuring the validity of patient agreements.
  • To emphasize the benefits of an educated patient in the decision-making process.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the concept and practice of informed consent in surgery.
  • Review of legal and ethical requirements for patient agreement.
  • Proposal of strategies to enhance patient education and negotiation.
Keywords:
Professional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A signature alone is insufficient evidence of valid informed consent.
  • Meaningful communication ensures patients understand risks, alternatives, and implications.
  • An educated patient is better prepared for surgical procedures and potential complications.

Conclusions:

  • True informed consent involves a comprehensive process, not just a signed document.
  • Effective patient education and negotiation are vital for ethical surgical practice.
  • Prioritizing patient understanding leads to improved outcomes and reduced paternalism.