Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A conceptual framework for evaluating human service delivery systems.

A L Selig

    The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
    |January 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Common myths of family feedback conferences.

    Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP·1983
    Same author

    Assessing families with a developmentally delayed/handicapped child.

    Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP·1981
    Same author

    Social workers as evaluators: case study of a program for consumer feedback in a psychiatric hospital.

    Social work in health care·1981
    Same author

    Computerized feedback for persons in a psychiatric hospital.

    Health & social work·1979
    Same author

    Evaluating a social work department in psychiatric hospital.

    Health & social work·1978
    Same author

    The myth of the multi-problem family.

    The American journal of orthopsychiatry·1976

    This study integrates behavioral science evaluation methods for program accountability. It offers a framework to guide administrators in understanding evaluation possibilities and relevant organizational variables.

    Area of Science:

    • Social Sciences
    • Behavioral Sciences
    • Program Evaluation

    Background:

    • Increasing demand for program accountability necessitates robust evaluation approaches.
    • Existing literature on evaluation methods is diverse, primarily from behavioral sciences.
    • Administrators and scientists require integrated frameworks for effective program assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To synthesize behavioral science literature on program evaluation.
    • To develop a comprehensive conceptual framework for evaluation.
    • To guide administrators in identifying key variables for organizational assessment.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and synthesis.
    • Conceptual framework development.
    • Identification of relevant organizational variables.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • An integrated conceptual framework for program evaluation.
    • A set of variables applicable across diverse organizations.
    • Enhanced understanding of evaluation possibilities for administrators.

    Conclusions:

    • A unified framework aids in program accountability and effective evaluation.
    • Behavioral science principles offer valuable insights for organizational assessment.
    • The proposed framework supports informed decision-making in program management.