Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual fields in glaucoma: a clinical overview.

Joanne M Wood1, Peter G Swann, Efty P Stavrou

  • 1Centre for Eye Research, School of Optometry, QUT Kelvin Grove, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, 4059, Australia.

Clinical & Experimental Optometry
|December 11, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of Functional Impacts of Vision Impairment: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same author

Identifying older adults' communication support needs and preferences: a scoping review of measurement instruments.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

Designing a new "turtle" optotype for use with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same author

Visual motion sensitivity and driving performance and safety.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Visual motion perception and driving hazard visibility at night-time.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Factors Influencing Communication for Older Adults in Residential and Community Aged Care: A Scoping Review.

The Gerontologist·2025
Same journal

An international survey of low vision rehabilitation services.

Clinical & experimental optometry·2026
Same journal

Readiness of the tabletop screen-based perimetry tests for screening and monitoring glaucoma.

Clinical & experimental optometry·2026
Same journal

Validation of the vision quality of life-time survey: comparison with the convergence insufficiency symptom survey.

Clinical & experimental optometry·2026
Same journal

Measuring contrast sensitivity in school children and young adults: a comparison between Pelli-Robson and SpotChecks charts.

Clinical & experimental optometry·2026
Same journal

Three-year retinal and visual outcomes after ultraviolet- and blue light-filtering intraocular lenses.

Clinical & experimental optometry·2026
Same journal

Repeatability of choroidal optical coherence tomography angiography metrics in healthy young adults.

Clinical & experimental optometry·2026
See all related articles

Automated visual field testing aids glaucoma detection. This paper guides practitioners in interpreting test results to distinguish early glaucoma from normal vision and identify true defects versus other factors.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Static automated visual field testing is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring primary open-angle glaucoma.
  • Automated testing generates extensive data, but interpretation remains a manual challenge for clinicians.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a clinical overview for systematically reviewing visual field plots.
  • To help practitioners differentiate early glaucoma from normal visual fields.
  • To identify factors that may cause apparent visual field defects.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of visual field plots.
  • Analysis of common artifacts and patient-related factors affecting test results.
  • Overview of alternative visual field testing techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Guidelines for recognizing patterns indicative of glaucoma.
  • Identification of common pitfalls in visual field interpretation.
  • Discussion of strategies to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate interpretation of visual field data is essential for effective glaucoma management.
  • Understanding potential confounding factors improves diagnostic precision.
  • Alternative testing methods can supplement standard visual field analysis.