Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implicit and explicit learning in young adults with mental retardation.

Julie A Atwell1, Frances A Conners, Edward C Merrill

  • 1The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487, USA.

American Journal of Mental Retardation : AJMR
|December 12, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personality traits predict attitudes toward individuals with intellectual disability.

International journal of developmental disabilities·2023
Same author

Research Note: Testing the Simple View of Reading in Adolescents and Adults With Down Syndrome.

American journal of speech-language pathology·2023
Same author

Permissive parenting mediates parental stress and child emotions in families of children with Down syndrome.

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID·2022
Same author

Wayfinding in Children: A Descriptive Literature Review of Research Methods.

The Journal of genetic psychology·2022
Same author

Executive function in Down syndrome: A meta-analysis.

Research in developmental disabilities·2020
Same author

The Acquisition of Survey Knowledge by Individuals With Down Syndrome.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2020

Individuals with mental retardation showed deficits in explicit learning but performed comparably to peers without intellectual disabilities in implicit learning. This suggests implicit learning is equivalent across these groups.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Investigating intelligence-related differences in learning processes is crucial for understanding cognitive development.
  • Explicit and implicit learning represent distinct cognitive mechanisms with varying susceptibility to intellectual disabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare explicit and implicit learning abilities in young adults with and without mental retardation.
  • To determine if implicit learning is preserved in individuals with mental retardation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an artificial grammar paradigm to assess sequence learning and identification.
  • Differentiated explicit learning through performance on random sequences and implicit learning via grammatical sequence identification.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recruited young adults with and without mental retardation for the study.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants with mental retardation demonstrated poorer performance on explicit learning tasks.
    • Individuals with mental retardation exhibited comparable performance to controls on implicit learning tasks.
    • Implicit learning showed resilience to intellectual disability in this context.

    Conclusions:

    • Explicit learning is impaired in individuals with mental retardation compared to neurotypical individuals.
    • Implicit learning mechanisms appear to be intact in individuals with mental retardation.
    • Results indicate that implicit learning of complex material is functionally equivalent across individuals with and without mental retardation.