Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening.

Mark I Evans1, Eric L Krivchenia, Yuval Yaron

  • 1Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center, 1000 10th Avenue, New York, NY 10019, USA.

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
|December 12, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variation in the Genetic Workup of Polyhydramnios: An International and Inter-Specialty Survey.

Prenatal diagnosis·2026
Same author

Exome Sequencing in Prenatally Diagnosed Isolated Neural Tube Defects: A Subtype-Specific Analysis.

Prenatal diagnosis·2026
Same author

Health Performance in North America: An International Comparative Review of Canada and the United States with Implications for Women's Health Equity.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC·2026
Same author

Fetal Macrocephaly: Prenatal Findings and Follow-Up in Cases With High Risk for Abnormal Outcome.

Prenatal diagnosis·2025
Same author

Incremental yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with truly isolated fetal growth restriction: diagnostic insights and clinical impact.

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM·2025
Same author

Diagnostic Value of Exome Sequencing in Isolated Polyhydramnios.

Prenatal diagnosis·2025
Same journal

A risk-based classification of late-onset fetal growth disorders according to intrapartum fetal compromise.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

The Cardiac-Fetal-Placental Unit: links between umbilical venous flow and maternal hemodynamics in fetal growth restriction.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Psychosocial interventions for women who are pregnant following a previous reproductive loss: A scoping review.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Controversies in fetal therapy.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Alloimmunisation in pregnancy: current management and future perspectives.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Consensus in prenatal management of Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
See all related articles

Obstetric screening has evolved significantly, moving beyond basic risk factors. Advanced techniques improve accuracy, making older methods like maternal age less critical for identifying high-risk pregnancies.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medical Screening Technologies
  • Reproductive Health

Background:

  • Obstetrician/gynecologists routinely use screening procedures in clinical practice.
  • The Papanicolaou (Pap) smear for cervical cancer has been a life-saving screening tool for over 50 years.
  • Screening has historically relied on factors like advanced maternal age.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution of obstetric screening procedures.
  • To highlight advancements in screening technologies and their impact on clinical practice.
  • To emphasize the importance of general screening principles for new technologies.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of obstetric screening techniques.
  • Analysis of the progression of screening for various conditions (e.g., cervical cancer, neural tube defects, Down syndrome).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the integration of ultrasound and biochemical markers.

    • Main Results:

    • Screening has advanced from single markers to combined ultrasound and biochemical methods for precise risk identification.
    • Improved screening techniques enhance sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.
    • Traditional risk factors like advanced maternal age may become less significant as stand-alone criteria.

    Conclusions:

    • Screening principles are crucial for evaluating and integrating new technologies in obstetrics.
    • The evolution of screening demonstrates a shift towards more precise and effective risk assessment.
    • Understanding these principles is key for adapting to emerging practices in obstetric care.