Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison study on two different accessing methods for retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy.

Allen W Chiu1, Y u-Lun Huang, Steven K Huan

  • 1Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Chi Mei Foundation Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.

Urology
|December 12, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative Analysis of 3-Year Reintervention Rates for Rezum vs. UroLift: A TriNetX Study.

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association·2026
Same author

Comparison of Prostate Cancer Detection Between an MRI-Directed Fusion Biopsy Strategy and Conventional Systematic Biopsy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Preoperative superselective transarterial ICG-lipiodol embolization for endophytic renal tumors in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a preliminary feasibility report.

BMC urology·2026
Same author

Elevated Risk of Acute Urine Retention in Patients with Symptomatic Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Following Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study from TriNetX.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Comparative study of ureteral access sheath versus suction access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery.

BMC urology·2025
Same author

Risk of Bladder Cancer in Patients with Chronic Indwelling Catheters: A Real-World Data Analysis.

Journal of Cancer·2025
Same journal

"Editorial Comment on "Vaginal Estrogen Prescription is Associated with Reduced Rates of Serious Adverse Outcomes in Women of All Age Groups With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: An Epic Cosmos Database Analysis".

Urology·2026
Same journal

The True Oral History of Buccal Mucosal Grafts for Male Urethral Stricture Repair.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Preventing Postpartum Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Clinical Evidence and Policy Gaps in U.S. Coverage of Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Editorial Comment on "Through the Eyes of the Applicant: A Qualitative Study of the Urology Residency Match".

Urology·2026
Same journal

Editorial Comment on "A Histopathologic Assessment of Prostate Ductal Anatomy in Relation to Micro-Ultrasound".

Urology·2026
Same journal

Same-Day Discharge Following Multiport Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Prospective Feasibility Study of Outcomes, Costs, and Post-Discharge Healthcare Utilization.

Urology·2026
See all related articles

Finger dissection is a faster and equally effective surgical access method for retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (RA) compared to balloon dissection. Balloon dissection may not be necessary for most patients undergoing RA.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (RA) is a minimally invasive technique for adrenal tumor removal.
  • Access methods for RA include direct needle insufflation with balloon dissection and finger-assisted dissection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and outcomes of two retroperitoneal laparoscopic access methods for RA.
  • To evaluate operative time, complications, and recovery between balloon dissection and finger-assisted dissection.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of operative data from 120 patients undergoing RA for benign adrenal tumors.
  • Comparison of outcomes between 70 patients accessed via balloon dissection and 50 patients accessed via finger dissection.
  • Analysis of surgical parameters based on tumor laterality, pathology, and size.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Finger dissection group had a significantly shorter operative time (118 min) than the balloon dissection group (143 min; P=0.03).
  • No significant differences were observed in peritoneal perforation, blood loss, oral intake, analgesic use, hospital stay, or convalescence.
  • Operative time increased for tumors >5 cm, but both methods showed similar times for larger tumors.

Conclusions:

  • Finger-assisted dissection is a more efficient and equally effective access method for RA.
  • Balloon dissection may be unnecessary for RA in patients without significant obesity.