Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

A Reversible, Non-invasive Method for Airway Resistance Measurements and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sampling in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2010
How should we quantify asthma control? A proposal
Louis-Philippe Boulet1, Véronique Boulet, Joanne Milot
1Centre de recherche de l'Hôpital Laval, Institut de cardiologie et de pneumologie de l'Université Laval, 2725 chemin Sainte-Foy, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada. lpboulet@med.ulaval.ca
Background:
Current asthma guidelines suggest a series of criteria to assess if asthma is controlled. However, there is a need to develop a simple and practical method to quantify the degree of such control, both in clinical practice and research.
Study Objectives:
This report describes a new method to quantify asthma control based on a percentage score. It also aims at comparing the percentage scores obtained with patient's self-evaluation of asthma control and a current validated Mini Asthma Quality of Life (MAQOL) questionnaire.
Setting And Subjects:
Forty-two subjects (25 female and 17 male patients) with asthma of different severity recruited from a tertiary center asthma clinic.
Methods:
The asthma scoring method provided a percentage control for symptoms, baseline expiratory flows and, an optional parameter, for airway inflammation assessed from induced-sputum eosinophil count. These control parameters were compared to an overall assessment of asthma control by the patient (also on a 100% scale) and the score obtained from a validated MAQOL questionnaire.
Results:
Mean +/- SEM scores for symptoms, expiratory flows, and airway eosinophilia (last 2 weeks) were 87.8 +/- 1.4%, 88.6 +/- 1.8%, and 66.2 +/- 3.9%, respectively. No significant correlation was found between these three parameters (p > 0.05). The mean global asthma control score and the score estimated by the patient were 80.9 +/- 1.5% and 91.7 +/- 1.5%, respectively (not significantly different). There was a significant correlation between asthma control score (percentage) and percentage symptom score (p < 0.001), while it almost achieved significance for FEV(1) (p = 0.05). Only symptom scores correlated with the MAQOL questionnaire.
Conclusions:
We developed a simple easy-to-use asthma control scoring system based on a percentage of optimal control. The percentage symptom score but not the global control score of this new method correlated with patient's global assessment of asthma control. This could be a simple tool that is potentially useful both for the clinician and for research purposes, to quantify global or specific aspects of asthma control.
Related Concept Videos
Asthma-I: Introduction
Asthma-II: Pathophysiology and Classification
Additionally, environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in determining an individual's susceptibility to asthma and the severity of their condition.
Critical processes in asthma pathophysiology include:
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Asthma-IV: Nursing Management
First, in...
Asthma I: Introduction

