Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

New challenges for gamete donation programmes: changes in guidelines are needed.

Rafet Gazvani1, Mark P R Hamilton, Sheila A Simpson

  • 1Department of Gynaecology, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS.

Human Fertility (Cambridge, England)
|December 13, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

27 years of prenatal diagnosis for Huntington disease in the United Kingdom.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2018
Same author

European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2016
Same author

Mutations in XPR1 cause primary familial brain calcification associated with altered phosphate export.

Nature genetics·2015
Same author

Duration of luteal support after IVF is important, so why is there no consistency in practice? The results of a dynamic survey of practice in the United Kingdom.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2014
Same author

The delivery of heavy menstrual bleeding services in England and Wales after publication of national guidelines: a survey of hospitals.

BMC health services research·2013
Same author

Evaluating maternity care using national administrative health datasets: how are statistics affected by the quality of data on method of delivery?

BMC health services research·2013
Same journal

Do they work, and are they worth it? Proposing a framework of evidence synthesis for guiding the evidence-based use of add-ons in <i>in vitro</i> fertilisation.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Investigating the effect of preconception untreated subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH above normal range and below 6.0 mIU/L) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Does ICSI timing impact cumulative live birth and perinatal outcomes - a cohort study.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Association between dietary quality indices and female infertility: a population-based study using NHANES 2013-2020.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Contact experiences among donor conception parties: donor conceived persons, donors, parents and same-donor siblings - a mixed methods systematic review.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Single mothers by choice in Hungary: motivations for solo motherhood and the importance of genetic ties.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
See all related articles

Current UK law restricts donor-conceived individuals' access to genetic origin information. New regulations are needed for gamete donation, addressing genetic disease risks and donor/recipient counselling.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 in the UK limits identifying information for donor-conceived individuals.
  • Existing gamete donation screening protocols inadequately address genetic disease risks.
  • Lack of guidelines for managing genetic information disclosure post-donation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight concerns regarding genetic disease screening in gamete donation.
  • To propose solutions for managing genetic information disclosure to donors and recipients.
  • To advocate for regulatory changes accommodating advancements in genetic technologies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current UK legislation and screening practices.
  • Analysis of ethical and practical challenges in genetic information management.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Formulation of recommendations for policy and practice.

    • Main Results:

    • Current practices fail to address genetic disease risks adequately.
    • There is no established procedure for informing donors or recipients about emergent genetic conditions.
    • Donors and recipients face uncertainty regarding genetic health implications.

    Conclusions:

    • Donors should be informed of potential genetic risks and offered counselling and predictive testing.
    • Regulations for gamete donation require revision to incorporate genetic advancements.
    • Storing donor DNA samples is recommended for future genetic information provision.