Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validity of screening.

M Henderson

    Cancer
    |January 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Evaluating disease screening programs requires understanding the difference between screening and diagnosis. Key metrics like specificity and sensitivity are crucial for assessing test accuracy and overall program success.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Transient dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype and positive Bartonella serology in a cat.

    Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2025
    Same author

    Effectiveness of behavioural and psychological interventions for managing obesity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis framed using minimal important difference estimates based on GRADE guidance to inform a clinical practice guideline.

    Pediatric obesity·2025
    Same author

    Association between psychological distress trajectories from adolescence to midlife and mental health during the pandemic: evidence from two British birth cohorts.

    Psychological medicine·2023
    Same author

    Primary care triaging of head and neck cancer referrals using the head and neck cancer risk calculator version 2: impact on a tertiary head and neck service.

    The Journal of laryngology and otology·2022
    Same author

    Developing and testing a case-management intervention to support the return to work of health care workers with common mental health disorders.

    Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2022
    Same author

    Do initiation rites hasten sexual debut among adolescent girls? A longitudinal analysis from Ghana.

    Culture, health & sexuality·2022
    Same journal

    Real-world safety, prognostic, and design considerations in ketogenic diet trials for pancreatic cancer.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Proliferative ecotype determines lethal prognosis and therapeutic benefit in urothelial carcinoma.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Reply to "Real-world safety, prognostic, and design considerations in ketogenic diet trials for pancreatic cancer".

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Pediatric cancer survival in the United States from 2001 to 2021.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Updates on intratumoral therapies in melanoma.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Scientific highlights and perspectives from the International Inflammatory Breast Cancer Symposium 2025".

    Cancer·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Public Health
    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Screening programs aim for early disease detection.
    • Distinguishing screening from definitive diagnosis is essential for accurate program evaluation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To discuss the technical aspects of evaluating disease screening programs.
    • To introduce the concept of evaluating the entire screening program, not just individual tests.

    Main Methods:

    • Discussion of key performance indicators for screening tests.
    • Illustrative examples of specificity and sensitivity in practice.
    • Conceptual framework for total program evaluation.

    Main Results:

    • Specificity and sensitivity are critical for interpreting screening test results.
  • Successful screening programs depend on multiple determinants beyond test accuracy.

    • Conclusions:

    • Effective evaluation of screening programs necessitates a comprehensive approach.
    • Understanding the interplay of test characteristics and program design is vital for successful early disease detection.